【硬核加长版】真正的做空
By 小Lin说
Summary
## Key takeaways - **Shorting: Borrow, Sell, Buy Back, Return**: Short selling involves borrowing a stock, selling it, and then buying it back at a lower price to return it, profiting from the price difference. This process requires an intermediary like a securities company and may involve paying interest on the borrowed stock. [01:15], [01:33] - **The Peril of Infinite Losses in Shorting**: Unlike buying stocks, where losses are limited to the investment amount, short selling carries the risk of infinite losses. If a shorted stock price rises dramatically, the potential losses can be unlimited, causing significant anxiety for fund managers. [03:42], [04:04] - **Long-Short Strategy: Hedging Systemic Risk**: To mitigate the risks of short selling, hedge funds often employ a long-short strategy, simultaneously shorting one stock while buying another. This strategy aims to hedge against market-wide 'beta' risks, allowing profits to be made from the relative performance of the positions. [07:31], [07:42] - **Muddy Waters: Exposing Fraud Through Research**: Firms like Muddy Waters specialize in short selling by conducting in-depth research to expose companies committing financial fraud. Their strategy involves detailed reports, often exceeding 20 pages, to convince the market of a company's deceit before shorting its stock. [12:07], [12:44] - **Short Squeeze: The Danger of Forced Liquidation**: A short squeeze occurs when a heavily shorted stock's price rapidly increases, forcing short sellers to buy back shares to cover their positions. This buying pressure further drives up the price, creating a snowball effect that can lead to massive losses for short sellers. [29:01], [29:37] - **Moral Pressure and Market Revolt Against Short Sellers**: Short sellers often face significant moral pressure and public backlash, as their profits come from a stock's decline, which harms other investors. In extreme cases, like the GameStop saga, this disdain can lead to a market revolt where retail investors collectively bet against short sellers. [33:21], [33:55]
Topics Covered
- Why does short selling lead to infinite losses?
- Is being right about market direction enough?
- Short selling: Are they investigators or financial firms?
- Speculative attacks: Market correction or crisis catalyst?
- The ultimate market weapon: What is a short squeeze?
Full Transcript
Hello peeps, today’s video content is very hardcore
Let me tell you
when I was preparing for the content
I can feel that all the ideas and knowledge
were pouring out
Are you all ready?
Today we're going to talk about
Short Selling
Talking about short selling
we can feel that in financial market people are having fun doing it
For example in the movie The Big Short they were short selling subprime mortgages
Muddy Waters Capital shorted Luckin Coffee China Concept Stock
Soros shorted GBP
and last year Wall Street vs. retail investors and their various short selling act
Today Lin has prepared to combine all these
classis cases
of course there are some success stories as well as failed stories
Let’s go through the whole logical process behind it together
and understand what is short selling
how many ways to do it
and why it’s not as simple s you think
Now will be a good time to give a thumb up
It's not difficult to understand the concept of short selling
If you know what it means
you can skip this part (jump to 2:22)
Under usual circumstances
if we want to invest
and you have spotted a stock or futures
you'd expect it to rise
and you'll buy in right
You'll wait for it to rise and sell it
and make a profit from it
We know that these finance products they can rise and certainly it can fall
If I expect a stock to fall
can I make money from it?
Actually it’s easy
just change the order
I'll sell it first
when the stock drop, I'll buy it in
and earn money from it
This is short selling
Of course some people will be more specific in
differentiating between short and short selling
most of the time we’d use it interchangeably
so that’s how we will use it too
Some ask, to short sale we have to sell first and then buy
But what if I don't have the stock?
How do I sell?
That's a good question
Now you have to find a person
to borrow this stock
and then sell it
and buy it back when the price fall
return it back after you bought it
For example
if you think a stock is bearish
Lao Wang Tea Shop, definitely not Xiao Lin Tea Shop
Right now the price of stock of Lao Wang Tea Shop is 100
But you think it’s not going well
that the price will definitely fall
Now you want to short it
but you don’t have the stock of Lao Wang Tea Shop on hand
what to do now?
Look next door there’s a guy named Lee
He has the stock of Lao Wang Tea Shop
You can ask him, hey Lee can you borrow me your stock?
Lee borrow his stock to you
You sell the stock
Now you have 100
Two days later, as per your expectation
assuming the stock price fall to 50
and you buy it back
You actually just spent 50
The remaining 50 is your profit
Then you can return the stock you bought
to the owner, Lee
There’s no loss for Lee
as he is holding the stock of Lao Wang Tea Shop in long term
For you however,
you’ve earned 50 bucks
This is the basic procedure of short selling stocks
We borrow and then sell it
Buy it back and return it, there you go profit
The procedure seems simple enough
But if we dig a little dipper
there are two problems
Lets see if you have the same doubt
First, where do you think we can find a man like Lee?
How would you know who would be holding Lao Wang Tea Shop’s stocks
Second, even if you can find Lee
Why would Lee borrow his stocks?
Let’s talk about
the first question
Where to find Lee
Now is the time you find an intermediary
Generally, you can find securities company
because there are many ppl open an account with them
so they would know who is holding Lao Wang Tea Shop stocks
They can help you find the Lee(s) who are willing to borrow their stocks
But of course if you are big short seller investors
you can have an investment bank to serve you
There is a department in investment banking
called Prime Brokerage
They are responsible for helping you to find the Lee(s)
Alright, second questions
Why would the stockholders borrow you their stocks for no reason
Of course it’s not for no reason
We know in the financial market
you need to pay interest for borrowing money
Similarly, you have to pay interest when borrowing stocks
We’ll get into details later
So to simplify
in theory
Short sale is essentially the opposite of buy long
One hope the stock price will rise
Another hope the stock price will fall
that's it
Normally if people talk about shorting
they’ll stop here
Look at our time bar
it's only there
The interesting part
has just begun
Let’s look at short selling in our actual world
See how it’s being done
Didn’t we say earlier that shorting means you get more profit if the price of stocks fell more?
Assume that Lao Wang Tea Shop stock price is 100
It goes to bankruptcy when it fall to 0
and you’ll earn 100
On the other way around
if one day
Lao Wang Tea Shop
released a big piece of good news
For example he collaborate with Xiao Lin Tea Shop
The stock price will definitely increase sharply
to 200, 300, 400
now at this time you will lose 100, 200, 300
The more it rise the more you lose
and your hair will also starts falling
infinitely
This is one main characteristic of
which is that you will face limited profit
and
maybe it’s nothing in theoretical model
it’s just a characteristic of the distribution of payoff function
However in reality it will cause fund manager
to lose bunch of hair
What you face when you do short selling is infinite losses
So as a fund manager who short sells for long term
you will face anxiety
You'd often see a stock
rise several times in a year
we're not just talking about individual stock
Just US large-cap stocks alone from March 2020 until 2022
have doubled up
Evem large-cap stocks have doubled up
those short sellers are definitely not having the best time
We mentioned in previous video
about Enron financial fraud case
In fund circle
there is one particularly famous short-seller
In 2010
in his analysis he found that
there’s financial problem within Enron
so he began to short sell Enron
and earned $500 million
and rose to fame
Later he succeeded in shorting Luckin Coffee
and a German company, Wirecard
which also involved in financial fraud
There was also a car rental company in the US that went out of business
called Hertz
Isn't he great, aimed one caught one
But even the best man make mistakes sometimes
And we just said that shorting will face unlimited losses
For example in 2016
After a rigorous analysis by Jim Chanos
He has a new shorting target
Tesla
He did a fundamental analysis
and found that Tesla’s stock price is ridiculously high
In comparison with other car manufacturing companies
Like BMW, Mercedes Benz
it’s absolutely illogical
So he started to build a position to short Tesla
Often during interview
he would promote his theory
Actually in the first 3, 4 years it was still quite okay
Tesla’s stock was moving normally
because the public don’t know what Tesla
could build
During 2018, 2019
Tesla’s production grew exponentially
People’s doubt toward Elos Musk faded
When the market hasn’t reacted
Chanos had the chance to withdraw
but not only he didn’t withdraw
During an interview at the end of 2019
he still claimed that Tesla was overvalued
Well we know what happened
Imagine Chanos’ hair
just dropped a handful
From 2016 when he started to build position to short Tesla
until he pulled out, Tesla’s stock increased by 18 folds
Luckily he has a rule
Not one individual stock
can exceed 5% in his
investment portfolio
His principle actually saved him this time
so that he didn't end up badly out of pocket
But even so
The investors’ money are mostly pulled out
Actually not just Chanos
Tesla is the most shorted stock in history
It’s just that Chanos was
the one who made the loudest noise
These shorters were indeed unlucky
they went against Elon Musk
According to statistic, in 2020, those who shorted Tesla
had lost
$40 billion in total
Imagine how many tonne of hair fell of from these fund managers
Another example, before 2008 subprime mortgage crisis
actually there are many short sell institutions already saw bubbles
Like in the movie The Big Short
Fund manager Michael Burry
started to use various financial products
like Credit Default Swap (CDS) to do Valuation Adjustment Mechanism (VAM)
You see, as assets rise,
he loses
he was at the end of the rope
and prohibited investors to pull out their funds
He was working very hard every day
days were like years
he almost couldn’t make it
But fortunately
not fortunately
It’s fortunately for him, the subprime mortgage crisis erupted
He went through it and survived
but there are many fund managers
they didn’t make it
So you see shorting has a bottomless pit feature
It’s very terrifying for a fund manager
shorting is really not a job for anyone
If you’re not careful, you could end up like Chanos
A lifetime of fame is ruined
This simple method of shorting
has too much of risk
so in the market, hedge fund managers
that focuses on shorting stocks like Chanos
are actually quite rare
In fact, in most cases shorting is accompanied by hedging
which means when I’m shorting a stock
I’ll buy long on another stock
or buy long on large-cap stock index futures
This is a very common hedge fund strategy
and this is called Long-Short strategy
Example, I think Lao Wang Tea Shop stock will fall so I can short it
But I’m worried that the market will go bullish
at this time I can buy long on another more stable stock
like Xiao Lin Tea Shop
Under such circumstances
assuming in the market both stocks rise or fall together at the same time
My earnings will not be affected
In another word, buy short one stock and buy long for another
I have hedged the systemic risk of the market
Sometimes we also call it Beta
But as long as my long position in Lin Tea House
performs better than short position in Lao Wang Tea Shop,
I make money
Let me mention one more thing
Actually sometimes
This long-short strategy
doesn’t mean that if I’m shorting an individual stock
I have to buy long one individual stock
Sometimes I can short an individual stock
I can buy long on stock index futures
Can be directly understood as you buy long on large-cap
For example I short sell on Lao Wang Tea Shop
at the same time I buy long on S&P stock index futures
or I buy long on Xiao Lin Tea Shop
and short sell large-cap stock index futures
Usually it works like this
a bit complicated
but it’s actually very common in hedge fund
In long-short strategy
there is a classic player
a big shot in hedge fund world
His name is Julian Robertson
we'll call him Rob
We've mentioned him before in one of the previous video
He founded Tiger Management
From the 80s
he has been using just this one strategy
which is long-short strategy
In 15 years
he managed to use $8 million
and earned $7 billion
increase by almost 10,000 times
In the 90s Rob and his Tiger Management
was a God-like existence
From 1995
with the rapid development of Internet technology
there were a lot of Internet companies emerged in the market
that were not profitable
had been listed for financing
The U.S. stock market went into bullish mode
but Rob
a very steady investor
still look at the fundamental
He believed that these Internet companies were overvalued
so he started to short these Internet companies
and at the same time he bought long on Blue Chip Stocks to hedge
It’s what we talked about before
Long Short Strategy
Unexpectedly, those Internet companies were still in bullish momentum
The valuation models in the market at the time could no longer explain the value
So they came up with some new models
and used it on Internet companies
If I wanted to estimate the value of a customer
and look at growth index
and give a valuation on these Internet companies
The whole Internet industry was booming
At this juncture, not only was Rob
losing money due to bullish stock price
but at the same time he was facing doubt from investors
Investors thought that
Internet industry is the future
how could you short it
I have to pull out my fund now
At this time, even though Rob believed that he was right
But the market was in very Bullish mode
On one hand he had to pay margin
On another, investors are pulling their money out
The size of his fund
went from $21 billion
down to $700 million
In early 2000, Rob couldn’t hold on any longer
I don't understand this market anymore
and shut down Tiger Management
I don't want to play anymore
But half year after Tiger Management closed down
All the money in the market had been attracted to the stock market
The passing game could no longer be played
So the stock started to plummet
The Nasdaq index fell by 75% in a year
Many Internet companies began to go bust
That was when people realise
those previous booms
were just bubbles
This is the story
we often hear
The Dot Com Bubble
Rob was actually right
Too bad he not only has to get it right
He also has to get his timing right
A lot of people think that
Rob pulled out before
the bubble exploded
was a big mistake
But personally I admire him
He was looking at the bubbles getting bigger
and held on alone for so long
most importantly
imagine a legendary hedge fund manager
who under such huge losses
decided to quit
and pull out fast
it was actually a very difficult decision
So in the end he still managed to keep
His status as a hedge fund kingpin
After all, everyone knows
If you want to estimate market
estimate the right direction
It can still be within grasp
but if you want to get the right timing
not to say it’s impossible
it'll be harder than reaching the sky
These institutions they know
they can't just sit there and die.
You can’t pray all day
waiting for the stock to plummet
how long could you wait
Just like Chanos
When he was shorting a stock
he’d promote it around
Look at Tesla
it’s being overestimated
are you all blind?
But even with Chanos voicing out like that
The market was just ignoring him
Why do you think is that?
Because of Tesla's data
Everyone was actually there watching it
You may all quarrel
but you can only say how Tesla would be in the future
But when it comes to valuation
No one can convince the other about their valuation
The thing with this is each
can make their own justification
Chanos said that Tesla’s value was overestimated
Even Elon Mush twitted Tesla’s value was overestimated
But the stock price continues to grow
What can you do about it?
These shorters
has one move and that os
issue a research report
These institutions
will look for those
with actual financial fraud
or companies that actually commit fraud
and inform the market
there’s no need for valuation
it’s useless
because the data is false
it’s fabricated by the management
The management has character problem
In this case, regardless of whether the company's valuation is high or low
If you fabricate data
it’s a very serious taint
it’s an additional negative message
therefore the stock price will fall
Look how steady this is
When the price fall, I’ll be earning money from shorting
I’ll get to keep my hair
In actual financial market
there are vast amount of news coming out everyday
How to make the market believe what you claimed is correct
is real?
These institutions
will issue a
very detailed
research report
to prove that the company's finances are in trouble
It’s not just a simple 3 to 5 pages analysis
nor as easy as saying “I assume” or “I propose”
At least 20 or 30 pages or even tens of thousands of words are require
List the various crimes that this company is committing
Only then the market will look at you
Is there a company that comes to your mind?
A very famous company, that’s right
It’s Muddy Water Research
In fact, Muddy Water
its entire creation
including the idea of shorting
is all by chance
The founder of Muddy Water is
Carson Block
Carson isn’t majoring in finance
He has a PhD in Law
His startup failed when he was living in China
Carson’s brother is a stockbroker
In 2010
his father saw
a company named Orient Paper Inc
managed to be listed in US through backdoor listing
The company's financial report was very good
Annual revenue was about $100 million
His father thought he'd found such an amazing treasure
and he wanted to buy in a big amount of stocks
His son happened to be in China
This company is a paper mill
the operating model is easy to understand
So he would like his 33 years old son
who is Carson
to take a look at the condition of the paper mill
and also to train his son
Carson is an interesting guy
probably he read a lot of Sherlock Holmes as a kid
It was supposed to be undercover
but he went out of his way to find an American journalist
to contact Orient Paper Inc
and he himself posed as Chinese translator for the journalist
And these two
went in as a foreign media who wanted
cover the story of Orient Paper Inc
The management took them on a tour
They visited the factory
the production line
recorded a lot of visual data
Once he took a look at it
Carson found that Orient Paper Inc was actually in tatter
It wasn’t as great as reported in financial report
The plant and equipment are from the 1990s
These are photos taken when they were at Orient Paper Inc
and this is the photo of their competitor
Look at the comparison
He discovered that
$2.3 million worth of recycled cardboard allegedly reported by Orient Paper Inc
was actually a pile of paper shells lying out in the open, all soaked
According to their financial calculations
Supposedly
a company of the size of Orient Paper Inc
should have hundreds of trucks coming in and out every day
But what Carson saw was that
in front of the factory, there was only
single lane dirt road
They waited there for half an hour
and saw only one car parked out front
Carson was sure that
even that car
could be placed there by Orient Paper Inc
to put on an act
Carson knew they shouldn’t invest in the company
Dad, stop now
Not only we can’t invest in the company
we have to short it
And they really did short Orient Paper Inc
In June 2010
They published a 30 pages report
and exposed everything
It says in this report that it's estimated that in 2008
Orient Paper Inc’s turnover was overstated by 27 times
In 2009 sales were overstated by 40 times
Of course, Muddy Water openly stated that they shorted Orient Paper Inc
In the beginning it dropped a little
only 10%
after all Orient Paper Inc
was not some big company that can make waves
Muddy Water was also not well known then
The public had doubt about the report
But then as the media spread the news
this issue started to escalate
In the following days, Orient Paper Inc dropped 50%
Facing all kinds of doubts and problems
Muddy Waters published 8 reports within a month
to prove that their views are correct.
In the following years, Orient Paper Inc’s stock continued to fall
With this
Carson Block and Muddy Water
became famous
in this circle
Later they keep using this method
In November 2010, they exposed
and shorted RINO International
RINO admitted to committing fraud
and delisted
In February 2011
They exposed China Media Express
and later, China Media Express also delisted
In April 2011, they shorted Duoyuan Global Water Inc
it delisted as well
Including recently Luckin Coffee
Anyway, their reports are written more professionally and in more detail
They basically has only one trick
They first start with undercover visit
and then financial investigation
after they found target for shorting
they start to short, publish report
When the stock price fall, they pull out, make money and leave
Similar short selling companies
and the one we mentioned when talking about Nikola
Hindenburg Research
They also use the same strategy
Have you discover that these short selling companies that depend on research and publish report
instead of calling them a financial firm
you can call them investigation firm
They specifically look for dubious companies in the market
This approach also sounds very reasonable
it’s very clever
also useful to the society
It's about clearing out the bad apples
crack down on money hoarding in the financial circle
So in fact, for those companies
that keep their feet on the ground
it is a good thing
The problem is that these companies are not Justice Bao
thinking about eliminating harm from people
As a short selling institution
they must also want to profit from it
Although it is ideal to find such a blatantly deceitful company
but it's not really that easy to find.
Carson himself said that
the companies he is looking for must have these 3 major characteristics
First, it has to be large
the volume has to be large enough in order to make money
The company took so long to do all kinds of research
and the shorting
and once published, even if the stock fall, they would only earn 30k to 50k
It’s not worth the time
Why need to have good liquidity
Because if the liquidity is good, I can borrow the stock
and sell it, right?
We mentioned earlier there is a cost to borrowing stock
This cost depends on market supply and demand
If there’s always people who want to hold this stock
Like Apple Inc
The cost to borrow it for shorting will be very low
The annualized interest rate is about 0.25%
Demand for short positions like Tesla is high
therefore the cost for borrowing will be higher
about 2.5%
Another example, in early 2021
Wall Street vs Retail Investors, GME was heavily shorted
The demand for shorting was very high
At that time, the interest rate for borrowing GME reached nearly 80%.
sometimes it exceeded 100%
Which means for this stock
if you borrow it for one year for shorting
even if the stock fell to 0
you won't be earning money
This is why Carson said
The second L has to be those with high liquidity
The third one is Lying, that fraud exists
Think about it, a company that commits fraud
is certainly not easy to find
which means
you have to be the first person in the world
to discover that there’s a problem with this company
Moreover there are more and more short selling institutions
or research institutions looking for such companies
making it more difficult to find
This point is in conflict with the previous two points.
because a large company with high liquidity
the possibility of it committing fraud is very low
This is why institutions like Muddy Water
that depends on research
digging on info to short sell
they have very limited targets
the volume will be limited as well
For example, according to a report Muddy Water made to the SEC
They are actually only managing $260 million
with only 8 employees
What’s $260 million
in Wall Street? They are like little boy there
But actually amongst the short selling companies
they are very famous
The management scale of Muddy Water is not very large
for them to find a smaller volume company to short
is actually not that difficult
But the truth is otherwise
So you can often see Muddy Water
when they publish a report, they will say
We have reason to doubt
or we seriously doubt
or we have reason to believe
Because they don’t really have concrete proof
At the time when he shorted New Oriental
and shorted ANTA, it was actually base on guesses
So you see these short sellers shout louder than anyone else
That's also for business needs
You have to look at
their volume in capital market
and it’s actually very little
Previously we talked about Chanos
his asset was around $1 billion
At its peak, he was managing $6 billion
This is already very well known among short sellers
How much do think Warren Buffett's asset is
It’s close to $300 billion
In entire US stock market
there are only 3%-5% of stocks
being shorted
Most of it are
like the ones we mentioned in the beginning
Tiger Management
which uses long-short strategy
Those like Muddy Water who caught one short it
is actually very rare
This is why when someone asked Buffett
what do you think about shorting
Buffett said
for our company, shorting is
just like a fly’s leg
So it seems that by simply doing short is not gonna take you far
Those big sharks don't bother to do these things to be detectives to investigate
But there is a shorting method that belong to these sharks
and that is speculative attack
When these big sharks
sense that in the market
there is an asset which its value
has been overestimated
and he sense that there are many people feel the same way
but for some reason
the asset price stays in high position
they can straight away use high volume of capital
to burst the illusion
They’ll tell everyome
come let’s sell it with me
so they will use large volume of capital
to give a downward push to the asset
When the market finds out that someone is taking the lead
Asset began to plummet
They will reflect on themselves
Was the price too high?
Was the previous valuation too outrageous?
I want to follow and sell it fast
Let’s follow the shark and get some meat to eat
If we can get enough strong feedback in the market
Then it will forcefully bring the asset back
to a reasonable price range
In other words, it is a good correction mechanism
However, these are all theoretical knowledge of shorting capital
and how it is good for the market
But after all, everyone is irrational
In fact
you can't correct it back to
a really reasonable range
because everyone will get panic
so sometimes there will be stampede accident
which exacerbate market volatility and
could even trigger a financial crisis
This is why short position receives much backlash
Lin often says the nature of finance is credit
It's the market's confidence in you
Let’s say if you give a company full confidence
full credit
even though it might have little problem but you can support it and it will get healthy
Conversely, if you forcibly suppress confidence
the company which is not very stable in the beginning
and you went up there and trample it
it would make the company unable to recover from setback
If there is some capital shorting you aggressively
That’s like pointing at your nose and saying you are bad
Market confidence towards this company will be a devastating blow
This situation is very detrimental to the stability of the market.
Many countries that are having a financial crisis,
or when a financial crisis
has occurred
they prohibit the act of shorting
They are worried that these attacks
will bring additional
unnecessary shock and volatility
Talking about speculative attack I have two persons in mind
Let’s see you and I are thinking about the same persons
Let’s see you and I are thinking about the same persons
First is Jesse Livermore
Second is, I think everyone will thought of him
George Soros
Livermore was a legendary big shorter
We have one episode that talks specifically about him
You can watch it after this video
perhaps there could be something new to learn
In 1929
through over 100 brokers
he started to short US Stocks in large volume
the market cannot withstand
this kind of speculative attack
stock price started to plummet
Indirectly, this led to stock market crash
and the greatest Depression in American history at the time
Livermore, of course, made over $100 million from this
profiting out of national disaster
So this issue was actually criticized by a lot of people.
Soros is a financial tycoon, right?
He was famous for shorting the GBP in 1992
But today we are talking more about shorting stocks
Shorting foreign exchange and shorting stocks are two different concepts
Because when shorting foreign exchange
you are shorting a currency
it’s equal to buy long on
another currency
For example if you are shorting USD/JPY
When you short sell USD, at the same time you are buying long JPY
It is always a two-way symmetrical relationship
It's different from shorting stocks directly
Although we said Soros was shorting GBP
but it doesn't really have that much to do
with buying long and selling short
It’s just a pure speculative attack
still quite interesting nonetheless
If you are interested in this let me know in the comment
I’ll consider it and perhaps have an episode about this
Actually, we've talked a lot for today
But in the beginning I said
The ideas just kept flowing out
So we try to dig a little deeper
If there’s speculative attack
then there will be
speculative counterattack
Shorting is when someone bets against a stock
While shorting
it will usually be accompanied by a very strong speculative counterattack.
Because there are always people who don't want this stock to fall
Who are these people?
Like shareholders
shareholders
they certainly wish the stock price to increase
The management certainly wish the stock price to increase
who else? Brokers, market maker
Theoretically it doesn't matter to them whether the stock goes up or down
But they want the market to be active, they make more money when the market is more active
When are they usually active? It must be when the stock is bullish
When everyone is happy, It’s very active to sell at this time
So the brokers and market maker wish the stock price to increase
Who else? like media, investment banking, research institutions
these institutions
in theory, they should be neutral, right?
Their job is just to publish research report
But the problem is that these institutions are easy to be bribed
So in general they will more or less report more good news than bad
The short sellers are the only ones in the market
who stand firmly against everyone and
hope that price of stocks fall
Imagine how much pressure their little crowd is going to face
Since a lot of people want the stock price to rise
they will use various way to give positive incentive to stock price
Buffett once said
If you want to short a stock
without concrete proof
Then people you stood against will beat you up
So for shorters
you either have to have enough volume,
or you have to have enough ammunition
to hold out against
a field of people
Let me tell you a story
Two years ago the capital market was bubbling with noise
about the game between short selling and speculative counterattack
there is a hedge fund manager, Bill Ackman
Let's just call him Ackman
He’s incredible
In 2015
the management scale
had reached $16 billion
In 2013
He found a company
Herbalife Nutrition, a company that sells supplement
He noticed that this company never advertises
not many people heard of it
but its annual sales are $4.8 billion
What's going on here?
Upon investigation
he found that
Herbalife uses one marketing approach
Anyone
can become an independent seller of this brand
You can buy their products at discounted price
and then you can sell their products
You’ll get commission when you sell
Sounds normal
but there’s one unusual part
This marketing model
has a professional term
Multi Level Marketing (MLM)
Does it sound like a pyramid scheme to you?
Pyramid scheme also recruits members layer by layer
Actually the line between MLM and pyramid scheme
is often blurry
What matters is whether the products
are actually being sold to consumers
If it’s sold to consumers
you can call it MLM
But if you are earning money
from the people you recruits
it’s a pyramid scheme
After Ackman made the investigation
He is certan that Herbalife
is a pyramid scheme
and he started to short the company
He started by shorting $1 billion
Just one single position
is equal to
4 to 5 times Muddy Water’s volume
In the market,
Ackman is very influential
so when he said he is buying short
Herbalife’s stock price fell by 40%
Then just like we said
Ackman began to do things that’s related to shorting
He started to advertise and spent 30 to 40 million dollars
and publish report via various media
he even prepared a 300 pages PPT
to analyse Herbalife
how they started the scheme
According to Ackman's plan
some big shark leading the market with all his evidence in PPT
will definitely attract people to condemn Herbalife
then the stock price will dro[
SEC will intervene for investigation
the company will go bankrupt
and he will earn boatloads of money
Right at this juncture came a saboteur
Another shark called Carl Icahn
Carl Icahn
Icahn has been known for hostile takeovers
He is especially good at
acquiring companies that seem to be not performing
and restructure them
Icahn was watching Ackman shorting Herbalife
with $1 billion position
and he began to go against Bill
and bought in the stocks
The stock price increased by 20% on that day alone
He also started to promote and
told the public that Ackman was a liar
that he is shorting the stock just to earn money
that's why he started this
So now you’re just looking at two billionaires
starting a war of words
The onlookers were just enjoying the show
From the market performance
you’d know that the public is keen to believe
in the view that capitalists are evil
and the public sided with Icahn
The stock price rose slightly amid continued volatility
In 2014
there is an agency in US called FTC
Federal Trade Commission
So FTC started to investigate Herbalife
Two years of investigation finally bear fruit
FTC fined Herbalife with $200 million
ordered them to rectify its marketing model
and a bunch of financial penalties
see there’s another penalty
and rectification order
Sounds like Ackman won right?
too bad it’s not true
The sharks are truly amazing
When the news broke out
both of them were still arguing
Ackman said see there’s penalty
obviously the company has problem, I won, it’s a pyramid scheme
Icahn said it’s just a small fine
FTC didn’t say it’s a pyramid scheme
You are not right
In stock market, sometimes you really cant tell why
After the stock fluctuate briefly
all of a sudden it started to go up
2017, it increased by 51%
With such increase
The short position made by Ackman was like a bottomless pit
We mentioned earlier that shorting could incur infinite losses
Under such situation
Ackman had to
empty his position
and started to buy put options
Unexpectedly the stock continued to rise
in the end he gave up on options
and left quietly
With Icahn’s blocking
Ackman lost $1 billion
How miserable
We are getting deeper into the topic
But in the story
I purposely left out
one very important core logic
Why do you think Icahn rushed in
to bet against Bill knowing
Bill had spent $1 billion on short position
Does he has nothing to do?
betting against another shark
What if you lost?
RIght
But of course Icahn didn’t tell me
what he was thinking
I can only analyse based on my past experience
I think if Ackman didn’t short the stock
Icahn probably wouldn’t acquire Herbalife
He just wanted to bet against Ackman
There’s a very important reason behind this
It’s called short squeeze
We mentioned that when you short a stock
you actually have to borrow stock from broker or securities company
Securities company has to guarantee that
you have to give the stock back
after you’ve borrowed it
they will ask you to pay
something call Margin
Icahn knew someone is shorting $1 billion position
What will happen if he buy long in large volume?
Stock price will rise
In short term Ackman will lose money
When he loses money
broker will asked him to pay margin
If the stock continues to rise
Ackman will have to keep paying the margin
Until one day he couldn’t pay it
he’d have to liquidate
What would he do after liquidation
He will buy back Herbalife stock
with large volume of long position
It’ll cause Herbalife’s stock price to soar
This kind of soaring stock price due to forced liquidation
is actually a short squeeze
At the time Icahn bought in long position
he could earn a lot from it
We know Ackman is rich right
his foundation is quite solid
in Icahn’s mind
even if he can’t kill in one shot
he can just drag this
because as we mentioned
you need to borrow stock for shorting
it comes with a cost
The position as big as $1 billion
actually incurred very high cost
the longer he waits the more he loses
Ackman might not be able to hold if it dragged on
Icahn bought long on Herbalife
at most, if the stock dropped to 0
he’d only lose $1 billion
But if short squeeze appears
He could earn more than 100%
This was Icahn’s wishful thinking
Why do I think that, you ask
Actually at the time, Icahn was
already Herbalife's largest shareholder
and board director
Once Ackman announced he is pulling out
Icahn followed suit and quit the board
and even liquidate his position
Obviously he was not interested in Herbalife
He just wanted to use short squeeze to force Ackman into a corner
and profit from it
What do you think?
Does the logic makes any sense?
Let me show you how wild a real squeeze can be
Let’s move back in time to 1901
There was a railway company in US
the name is not important
there were two people, you don’t have to know who, not important
These two guy were vying for control of the company
In March and April 1901
they bought in a large volume of the company’s stock
The stock price rose from $20
to $130
There was a bunch of traders who didnt know what's going on
The stock price looked inflated
I have to short it
but the two guys were fighting hard
and they kept buying the stock
stock price went up to 150, 180, 200
when the shorter saw this
they wanted to quickly liquidate and leave
If they liquidate they have to buy back the stock
But then the two guys who were vying for control
none of them wanted to sell their stock
They've bought all the stocks available in the market
It’s impossible to buy back
The shorters were in panic
they were rushing in to buy
which increased the price further
Look at the stock price
from 200, 300, 500, 800
until in the end it rose to 1000
But no matter how high the stock price
they cant buy in
This is the ultimate squeeze
For these shorters
They were facing enormous loss on the book
The brokers were asking them to pay margin
they cant pay anymore
so the broker had to sell their other stocks
to pay for margin.
When they started to sell
it triggered
a stampede across the whole market
This is the Panic of 1901
Fortunately, the two men also realize the graveness of the situation
and decided to stop
cut the shorters some slack
and sold the stock to them for $165
The market finally stabilise
Even if the price was not as high as $1000
$165 is enough to make these shorters lose money
Two people fighting for control
at the same time made those small traders lose money
Isn’t that kind of amazing
Squeeze cases like this
happen very often in the market
Manipulating market
may sound exciting
but it has negative impact
on market stability
because there is no longer rational consideration
on the level of valuation
it’s based on sheer compulsion and panic
Just like the Tiger Management we mentioned
during the Dot Com bubble
they didn’t manage to hold on
and had to leave
If you look at Nasdaq Index at the time
you’d notice a surge before the bubble burst
Many suspected that
because of
big shorter like Rob was short squeezed
the surge happened
we usually see many interesting cases of these big shorts
it’s as if they've earned a lot of money
But in the cases I talked about today
a lot of them are about shorters being beaten up
Not that I purposely choose these cases
it’s actually very difficult to buy short in the market
like how we analyse just now
they have to face limited profit
infinite loss
target is limited
high cost of borrowing
pressure from the management to bet against
and the risk of being short squeezed
and of course massive hair loss
One more point, when we talk about shorting
a lot of people think it’s evil
and hated it
because if you buy long
even if there’s capital manipulation
everyone will profit when the stock rise
The whole market will be happy
If the stock dropped, everyone loses money
it’s bearable mentally
If you earn money by shorting
That must be because the stock price dropped
A bunch of people in the market wouldn’t be happy
so it feels like
they were taking pleasure in other’s pain
Another cost that has to be bore by shorters
is moral pressure
before this, people might just swear at you a little
or scoff at you
But it’s different after 2021
In the beginning of the year
the market bubbling with noise about
Wall Street vs Retail Investors long short war
this is purely because of the retail investors’ disdain on Wall Street shorters
So they started to buy in
stocks like AMC, GME
I don’t care about your valuation
I don’t care if I lose
I just wanted to bet against you
This forced a lot of the shorters
like Melvin Capital
to lose 50% in January 2021
Just GME stock alone
cost the shorters $91 billion
This case is textbook material
So you see when these shorters are too rampant
the whole market will revolt
I’m so tired
Is your brain now full of
knowledge
There many ways to short a company
you can also short options
stock index futures
you can do equity swap
stock swap
or something even more dramatic
like CDS credit default swaps etc.
But a lot of this is more mathematical
and the average person can't buy it
So today we only touch on shorting stock
Shorting stock sounded exciting
but there are too many traps and potential risks
that most people wouldn’t dare to touch it
Even some professional investors wouldn’t dare to short
This is why we often hear mutual fund, insurance
pension scheme they are not allowed to short
Because these are people’s life-saving money
No one can bear to let the fund manager to gamble it away
Of course we talked about
many features of shorting
that give so many interesting stories
Theoretically shorting could help market to increase liquidity
help the asset to correct and fall back to reasonable price
However, in the many true stories that had been told today
did you notice that it’s not that simple
in financial market
Lin had enough fun talking today
I think you are enjoying it too
So why not hit the bell, like button and subscribe
Loading video analysis...