BCG Maintenance Full SWOG Course
By Grand Rounds in Urology
Summary
## Key takeaways - **Full SWOG BCG Course Improves Recurrence-Free Survival**: Maintenance BCG therapy, as per the SWOG protocol, significantly decreases recurrence rates. Patients on maintenance experienced 76 months of recurrence-free survival compared to only 36 months for those without maintenance. [03:14] - **BCG Response is Binary: Responder or Not**: The speaker believes BCG treatment is binary; patients either respond or they don't. This is likened to the immune system being ready to be primed for treatment or not, similar to how PD-1/PD-L1 therapies work. [01:14], [01:37] - **Optimal Resection Crucial for BCG Efficacy**: For BCG to be effective, the bladder tumor must be thoroughly resected, leaving a 'raw surface' for the treatment to work. Gross tumor should not be left, as it does not respond to BCG. [04:50] - **Maintenance BCG is Standard for CIS and High-Grade T1**: The conventional wisdom and guidelines support using BCG maintenance for Carcinoma in Situ (CIS) and high-grade T1 bladder cancer. The speaker notes it's rare to see low-grade T1 cases that were initially classified as needing BCG. [08:35] - **BCG Tolerance Can Be Challenging**: Patient tolerance to BCG maintenance can be an issue, with some missing doses due to significant urinary symptoms or positive urinalysis results. This can complicate adherence to the full treatment protocol. [07:55]
Topics Covered
- Do Guidelines Account for Real-World Patient Variability?
- Why Maintenance BCG Decreases Recurrence Risk
- Are You a BCG Responder or Non-Responder?
- Reconsidering BCG's Risks and Practicalities
Full Transcript
[Music]
so I've been given the task of you know
we've got the debate here and it's
always these are always the fun ones but
this unfortunately I've been given the
easy part which is supporting what we
all most of us are practicing which is
the full SWOG course and so we'll make
this pretty quick and you've heard a lot
of it already from dr. cooks and so
we'll kind of unfortunately have no
financial disclosures so I'll briefly
review the swab course I'm not going to
do too much because this has already
been reviewed by Mike and and you know
then the next question is you know
guidelines what's recommended white
papers and it's really easy to sit in a
committee and say what everybody should
be doing because you might have your
practice your environment in an academic
institution or ivory tower and then
other people have other things in other
considerations and patients are
different and they're not all the same
and there's a lot of things that a lot
of these studies haven't controlled for
and will you know briefly talk on that
so I think knowing what really happens
is another issue right what really is
going on for all of these patients and
their ability to get back to the office
and things like that but ultimately you
know I'm gonna share with you that I do
I am a believer in BCG because I think
it's really one thing or the other
either BCG works or it doesn't work it's
one or the other I don't I don't I'm not
as much I don't buy into that there's
kind of a in-between road either
patients have an immune system that's
going to respond appropriately or they
don't some of you have maybe been at
this course before I've seen some of the
basic work we've done showing that you
know we and and really this is now
supported by all the PDL one and pd1
work that's being done demonstrating
that either your immune system is ready
to be primed or it isn't so the classic
you know swag study that was you know
published in I think it was in 2000 that
was headed up by you know large group of
well-known bladder cancer experts in
particular Don lamb I don't know if he's
here today he often comes to this
meeting was the cannot strain and the
bottom line was you you got induction
BCG and then you had it at three and and
the induction was once a week for six
weeks and then he had once a week for
three weeks at 3 6 12 18 24 30 and 36
months and it's once a week for three
weeks and you know there are variations
on that because ultimately what you're
getting is essentially three months
three years
every three months for the first roughly
first year and then every six months for
the remaining you know two years of kind
of stimulating that immune system again
kind of revaccinated if you will and and
I think it's a lot more complicated than
just stimulating a th1 response or that
you know cell mediated response in the
body because we know that patients that
whether they're PPD positive or not it
may or may not make a difference on how
they respond no different than whether
someone's PDL one positive or not if a
tumor is whether it'll respond to our
immunotherapy that's out there so it's
definitely much more complex than this
but this is what we've got and this is
how it works so why do we recommend it
and really comes down to this and that
is that in just about every randomized
or retrospective study that is out there
maintenance gives you a significantly
decreased risk of recurrence and the
original study demonstrated almost you
know half the recurrence rates when you
as far as recurrence free survival you
know seventy six months with when you're
on maintenance but it was only thirty
five months or 36 months when you had no
maintenance so it's really hard to argue
with that now how could you argue with
it they use the cannot strain that's
really not available here in the US I
think everybody uses theis right now
there's a trial the Tokyo trial which is
the SWA guess s1 6:02 looking at trying
to come up with some other strains for
us to potentially use which is the Tokyo
I think it's one seven two strain one
arm compared to BCG standard tights BCG
versus the Tokyo strain with an actual
vaccination 21 days prior to getting it
so that we can have other options we've
all lived in that world of you know BCG
not being available to us or to our
patients and having to you know
essentially strategize who's going to
receive it and that's when we all cut
back on maintenance you might remember
I'm sure all of us haven't encountered
that years ago so the one thing that
wasn't determined by this trial was did
it really change significantly the risk
of going onto cystectomy or getting
radiation or some sort of systemic
therapy and and that wasn't really
measurable I don't know that the trials
necessarily defined and designed well
for that and are people who argue
against maintenance or using maintenance
to this degree would say that the
overall
survival was the same and in the two
groups roughly a difference of 5 to 8%
nothing all that significant what else
and what do I use I'll tell you here in
a second but what else are the other
issues with this trial well there's a
lot of factors even dr. Cook has shown
you how well you resect the patient
originally is going to impact how well
the patient is going to do from BCG you
can't just leave them full of tumor and
give them BCG it's not going to work I
mean you effectively have to have a
little bit of a raw surface after the
resection so you want to do it at about
three weeks no no no later than a month
of to six weeks because otherwise you
might have new tumors and you need to
resect gross tumor doesn't respond to
BCG okay and the other issue is so these
trials in control for the TU RBT and the
and the quality or the effectiveness of
it and also they didn't control
necessarily for how the vaccine was
given how many interruptions there were
you know patients come in they have a UA
that's positive and they get pushed off
though they might have hematuria all of
these things that are very challenging
to control for in any trial but what do
I attend to use I actually use a little
extra BCG because as I said before I am
a believer that either you're a
responder or you're not a responder and
what that comes from is most of us think
that BCG stimulates that cell mediated
immune response now why a person gets a
tumor in the first place if your body's
doing the right thing is it should be
manifesting a cell immunity ated immune
response and why these tumors are there
is either one of two things in my
opinion and again this is opinion we
have one study that's been published and
I've demonstrated here at at this
meeting in the past is that either your
immune system didn't do the right thing
and you have a tumor or immune system
did the right thing and the tumor has
evaded the immune system and that's
where I think the whole PDL one pd-1
thing is come on come into play and why
we're gonna see these trials like a
tease ilysm ad that doctor Cookson
talked about and and although those
drugs seem to be the panacea for
everything at this point but we'll see
just like when TK eyes came out for
renal cell you know we all have to
temper a little bit of our excitement
but nevertheless because I think people
are responders and we've all seen these
patients that come in with CIS or
high-grade t1 you resect them you put
them on BCG and five years later you
still haven't had a recurrence of any
high-risk disease you might
have you know a little TA here and there
but those are the ones that I think
benefit the most I also believe and a
lot of people have demonstrated that if
they actually have significant symptoms
those irritative symptoms they keep
calling your office about they've
manifested a traumatic immune response
and they often do the best as well so I
ramped it up if it's working and so I
tend to do actually every three months
until they get so it's one extra
treatment so it's three six nine and
twelve and then they get 18 months of q6
I use it in every CIS patient and t1 as
far as ta there are some people who will
use it even in low-grade ta when you
have recurrences because you know you've
resected them then they come back again
and your sec them you come and you think
you should use the BCG while it's
appropriate you can consider using it I
really don't use it as often I think
high grade ta is something that is high
risk disease and you should use BCG very
judiciously in those patients because
often times I think they're not resected
enough and it's that enhance cystoscopy
it's gonna make a difference so what
happens in the real world we've kind of
referred to this already
some patients miss a dose sometimes more
than one and some miss several they
can't get through their maintenance so
that's one of the downsides to BCG is
that tolerance is an issue some of these
patients will have such significant
urinary symptoms and there UAE's come
back or their gram stain's come back and
everybody has a different way of
determining who's going to get their BCG
that day but all of those play in a play
a role and influencing how we treat our
patients finally some patients have
their own ideas of what they want to do
you know they don't necessarily want BCG
they don't want to come to the office as
frequently it's not that easy for some
patients if you're drawing from multiple
communities and so I think you have to
really strategize also for those
patients as well so what's the
conventional wisdom I think the
conventional wisdom is that BCG is for
CIS and high-grade t1 it's interesting
because I can very rarely imagine or
count on one hand off and I see
low-grade t1 that was in the guideline
just as a comment I mean you almost
start to suspect whether the pathology
was read appropriately I think you need
to get induction on board within about
three to four weeks from the resection
there used to be this fear of you know
BCG OSIS and I think that if you get a
good response and you're first
surveillance system which we do in the
operating room actually and re biopsy
and go and resect and to me that's the
most definitive way to know if someone
responded to their therapy well what are
the harms well you know I think the BCG
osis I cannot honestly remember the last
time I had such significant BCG oh so
the patient had to be admitted to the
hospital
you know dosed up with steroids and the
appropriate anti TB drugs
all of those things they're so
infrequent even though they're you know
it's out there and such a concern it is
inconvenient to do BCG frequently and
for some patients and I think you have
to then tailor your treatment based on
what their availability is to come in
and I think you need to decide with your
patients what your goals are you know
you have some patients who are trying to
spare their bladder and salvage their
bladder as long as possible what are the
comorbidities you need to take into
account all of those factors are they on
steroids for polymyalgia rheumatica and
then you may not want to use BCG and try
some alternative therapy all of these
things play a role but ultimately at the
end of the day the data speaks for
itself
it's in the guidelines it's been
referenced numerous times and I would
just say just do it do your maintenance
BCG and decide for yourself and your
patients whether you find the ones that
can't tolerate or if a recurrence and
then you can go you know the other way
following the guidelines so finally
after 18 months with no recurrence does
it really matter that's the real
question should you go to three years I
think yes and I usually tell my patients
it's working why ruin a good thing you
know we can sit here and say question
whether we shouldn't but if they're
tolerating it well all they're gonna get
is about three or four more treatments
you - we'll finish it up does it really
decrease recurrences yes does it matter
if they have symptoms I say yes and then
you should give them even more because I
think they're having a great response
you just got to find a way to make that
happen
you
Loading video analysis...