C. N. Yang: Stony Brook Masters Series
By Stony Brook University
Summary
## Key takeaways - **Epic Journey to US on Troop Ship**: In 1945, Yang flew from Kunming to Kolkata, waited two months for a 5,000-ton American troop transport ship, crossed the Mediterranean and Atlantic amid a storm where he vomited profusely, arriving in New York on November 24th. [02:11], [03:32] - **Atomic Bombs Spark Chinese Elation**: News of Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs caused great elation in China after eight years of brutal Japanese invasion; people exploded firecrackers in streets upon hearing the radio announcement, marking the end of misery. [06:08], [07:03] - **Enrico Fermi: Last Theory-Experiment Master**: Enrico Fermi was the last great physicist to contribute first-class work to both theoretical and experimental physics, as both fields became too complicated by the 20th century; he was solid, with speculations based on concrete thought. [10:56], [11:29] - **Gauge Theory Pursued for Beauty**: Yang-Mills theory, published in 1954, was not believed or matching experiments initially, but its elegant mathematical structure compelled publication; 20 years later experiments confirmed it as the precise principle structuring nuclear and weak forces. [31:01], [31:55] - **China-US Education Combo Ideal**: Yang recommends good high school and college in China for rigorous devoted training and depths in subjects like quantum mechanics, followed by US graduate school for creativity and frontier exploration; he benefited exactly from this path. [54:07], [55:05]
Topics Covered
- Atomic Bombs Ended China's Misery
- Enrico Fermi Mastered Both Theory Experiment
- Gauge Theory Structures All Forces
- Beauty Trumps Experiment Initially
- China Trains Rigor US Sparks Innovation
Full Transcript
[Music]
a theoretical physicist Cen Yang was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics in 1957 among a host of other contributions to his field his work with Robert Mills
resulted in Yang Mills Theory considered the basis of modern physics he has crossed paths with the other great minds in his field Einstein and fairy
Oppenheimer and Teller here at Stonybrook The Institute for theoretical physics which he directed for 33 years now Bears his name Dr Young thanks very
much for taking the time I'm very happy to be here you grew up uh in China the son of a mathematics professor yes can you tell us a little about your early
life I was born in central China but uh I grew up in Beijing uh so my primary school years
and uh four years of high High School were in Beijing and in 1937 I was uh 15
years old uh the signo Japanese war started and uh my family moved to southwestern China to a city called Quin
which is uh famous as the end of the Burma Road MH and uh I went to college there in 1945 I was
23 uh I want a scholarship to come to the United States uh so I came arriving uh on November the
24th uh in New York City uh because at that time there were no commercial traffic between China and
the US and the only way for me to come from kumin in southwestern China to the
US was to fly to Kolkata in India and they wait for a boat a ship one of those uh troop transport
ships of uh the American military forces which were used to transport the over million American soldiers in the China
Burma India theater from that area to the United States so I waited for two months in Kolkata for for a birth on one of
those troop transports and uh the ship was about 5,000 tons and we went through the
Mediterranean and the Atlantic Ocean where we got into a storm and I remembered I was vomiting so much and I said to myself maybe this trip is not
worth it but anyway I arrived uh in New York and uh went to Chicago and became a graduate student at the University of
Chicago that was quite a quite an adventure for a young man yes it was and of course uh to come to the United States from a completely different
culture was I wouldn't say it was a shock but it was uh it required some adjustment was it your um your knowledge
of physics that got you U that sort of bridged that that divide uh uh yes I had a very good uh education
both uh in college in kmin and later for two years in the same University as a graduate student earning a master's
degree um my level of Education in China was uh very Advanced uh such things like uh quantum mechanics I've studied uh thoroughly in
China so when I got to the University of Chicago which was uh which had at that time the world's best physics department uh I found that uh the
quantum mechanics course offered in Chicago was not as uh deep really nor as
uh detailed as the course I had in China so I had a head stall in some sense and uh so I earned a PhD degree in Chicago
in 1948 I was thinking that um when you made your journey to the United States it was at about that time that the United
States had dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki yes how did that how did that affect you if at all in
your in your field and as a person uh oh it has a profound effect uh you know uh China was fighting the
Japanese invasion from 37 to 45 uh eight years and um uh China was very weak at that time
and uh it was a miserable time and the Japanese uh were very brutal you may have heard of this uh massacre in nin
yes uh so uh and nobody had any inclin that uh there was this uh new weapon developed in the United States
uh in fact I understand most of the people in the US didn't know about it either right and so the morning in
August when the bomb was dropped when the radio announced the news uh it was a great Elation for the people in
China uh because uh everybody knew that's the end of the misery of the eight years of War uh uh I remembered uh
I was uh I came out of uh our house rented house and got onto the street and suddenly I saw many people uh exploding
firecrackers you know in the Chinese custom if you have something to celebrate you you have hundreds of
firecrackers and uh then I got hold of a newspaper and then realized uh what happened uh of course uh that was a
great event for the American people but I would say the American people did not suffer as much during the war as the Chinese people and as a consequence of
that the happiness and the Elation that was felt in China was proportionately higher did you understand the physics
ramifications of of the atomic bomb at that time uh the General Physics uh uh
principle that uh one can generate tremendous amounts of energy by Neutron
collisions uh was known since uh 38 and 39 and uh that in fact even got into
textbooks but uh the detailed uh procedure by which you can uh do that was a very complicated
Engineering Process and uh uh you probably know that uh it was so difficult that the
Germans in about 1944 or 43 decided uh it uh cannot be done
during that war so they abandoned that project uh fortunately they did uh and
the United States it was uh picked up uh first because of a letter iron wrote to president
Rus but more because of uh the fear among the American government and the F phist
especially that the Germans might uh get it first so they devoted the wholehearted effort at Los Alamos to do
this uh it's uh a most important event of course not only for the 20th century
it's one of the great events in the history of mankind you and I certainly don't wish to to U make this all about the bomb but
it's it's it's uh sort of coincidental that you went to Chicago the University where much of this work was done um and
uh one of your mentors there was fairy I believe yes tell me a little about fairy uh enrio fairy was born in two in
1901 in Italy uh at that time Italian physics was not so great and he was a precocious
young man and he alone uh lifted ital the level of Italian physics to World standards at a
very young age uh he was a remarkable person and I
had uh said that uh familyy was a person with both feet on the ground how so uh
in the sense that um he was very solid he looks like he was a solid person and he
is uh when he uh speculates on something you know that uh it was based already on
concrete thought which he had already uh been thinking about therefore his words carry Authority because you know that
these are not the random or of the top of one's head kind of remarks uh and he was a great theorist
as as well as a great experimentalist you know in early centuries uh many great physicists were both theoretical and
experimental but by the 20th century um theoretical physics has gotten so complicated experimental physics has gotten so complicated so
very few people could do both and uh Enrico FY was the last great physicist who contributed first class work
to both sides how was your relationship with him oh very close uh you see when I got to Chicago very rapidly everybody found
that this young man from China was extremely well trained uh so I had a very close and warm relationship with the
familyy uh Mrs FY uh the fies had two kids
and one of them the older one Nella was uh College age so the family is always uh hold a
square dance party in their house and I was there many times and got to know the family uh very
well uh in later on in 1949 uh FY and I wrote a paper together uh it's called our Meson Elementary
particles and I was very happy to see that that paper is still referred to today because uh we were the first to
publish a paper saying that uh what is known as a Pion uh may be a bound state
of a uh nuclear with an anti-nuclear these are probably two technical terms but anyway uh we wrote a paper together
and uh so I was the one of the favorite students of family in Chicago you of course knew uh
Oppenheimer you at The Institute for advanced study with Oppenheimer yes tell me about your relationship with him uh everybody knows that the opah
hammer became very famous because of it uh uh direction of the atomic bomb project during the war and in 1957 47 he
accepted the the directorship of the institute for advanc studies and um in 1949 he came to
Chicago to give a talk about a new uh development in physics called the renormalization I will not uh explain
why what it is but anyway that was the hottest uh topic around that time so I was
fascinated by his talk and I knew that uh starting that fall the fall of 1949 there'll be many experts on
renormalization uh at his Institute in Princeton so I applied to become a post talk at the
Princeton and uh abam accepted me so starting in 49 the four I went to The Institute for
advanced studies I was originally just going to be there for one year as a post do and returned to
Chicago but uh I remained and allog together I was in Princeton for 17 years from 1949 to
1966 and uh as you know the institute for Advance studies was a well-known Ivory Tower in the best
sense of the word their Scholars uh do their research uh without been bothered by committee work without being bothered by
graduate students and indeed I took great advantage of that that was the period that 17 years was the period I
did my best uh research work I I understood that um Oppenheimer tried to uh convince you to replace him when he left the Institute but that instead you
came here to Stonybrook which was barely uh barely peing out of the ground at the time what what what happened there uh yes uh what happened was the following
in 1965 uh first before President Kennedy was uh assassinated uh he
named alamer as the next enrio FY Prize winner
the enrio FY price was a presidential award it was originally awarded to fairy because uh F was Dy and they quickly
created this price and gave it to him before he died in 1954 and afterwards many distinguished
uh people who contributed to the US uh worldtime scientific work got the uh price including beta including
tellor uh Etc and uh probably or very likely because uh president President
Kennedy wanted to uh erase
the Sorrows that the the US Meed out to opah hammer in the opah hammer hearings of
1954 so he decided to give it give the next one in 62 to obah hammer but before that transpired he was assassinated uh
Kennedy was assassinated so then Johnson became president and uh in fact the rumors were that uh many of the people who are
against op Hammer uh tried to convince Johnson not to give that award but the Johnson did not listen to them so there
was a ceremony uh and alamer did win the world so that was uh I think it was 196 63 or
64 but anyway uh that was at the time so by
1965 uh aaham had just uh had this uh uh great event of the United States
uh government essentially saying implicitly we are sorry right and we apologize now upen Hammer is the director of the insute intitute had
great difficulties with the mathematicians in The Institute that's a long story I'll not bother you with the details he was a director but the
mathematics Group which is the strongest uh at the institute at that time and still today uh were unhappy with him in my
opinion uh they were wrong in a accusing uh upen hammer
of uh not favoring mathematics but anyway they made op Hammer's life very difficult for many
years so one day in 65 I remember opah Hammer dropped by my office and said uh
Frank uh I'm thinking of uh retiring as director how do they think about it I was uh surprised uh but I thought about it for
a few minutes and I said uh I think this is a good decision because I said you have been at the institute for a long time now and
this is the right moment because a there is a law in the opposition on the part of the mathematicians against
you and uh In the Heat of great debate it's difficult for you to say I want to retire and secondly the United States government
has essentially apologized to you uh this is the right moment so he thanked me for my
opinion then he said uh I want to propose you as my successor my instinctive reaction
immediately was that uh I don't want to to do it because uh I'm not a administrative type it's
uh uh so I told him I'm honored that uh you thought so but uh I'll think about it for a few
minut for a few days so I thought about it and uh eventually I wrote him a letter saying that
uh uh how I am not sure I'll be a good director I'm however very sure that I
won't enjoy the life of being a director so that's the end of that part of the story but just around that time a little bit uh before my final decision but
after he had mentioned his proposal to me uh John tol who had just become who had just been nominated as the president
of uh stook uh came to visit me and asked me to join him in stook to develop
stook into a uh great research University uh so uh when I wrote that letter to OB
Hammer I had already decided with my family that I'm going to move to stook that was in
65 and you came on the pretty much on the promise that a great research institution would be built here because there was none at the time yes uh you of
course know that um ston began about 50 years ago but it was uh in another
campus and the the real expansion started uh when it moved here and the great expansion started when jto came in
65 and 66 and uh that was a great period of uh expansion and I think uh what you see
today uh have all in many senses originated with the few
beginning steps that uh John to and his uh Administration put in place and that you helped him with uh yes in
some respects you knew also Einstein uh yes I went to The Institute as I told you in
1949 uh he was uh 70 years old at that time and he had just retired but uh he lived close to the Institute and
he would still walk to the Institute every they he he didn't drive and uh he would walk uh to his office and then stay a
few hours and then walk back now uh at that time uh I irance position in physics was towering
it's I had said uh repeatedly that the Newton and Einstein are the two greatest physicists
of all four times and uh but uh he was at that time no longer working on the things that we
were we young people were interested in so we didn't so much uh bother him uh however I did
hear uh two lectures by him and uh in 1951 I
think uh I think 51 or 52 uh he sent his assistant Brewer cman uh to me and said uh you just
published a paper in the physical review uh about uh gas liquid uh how gas became a liquid how upon
Cooling and uh Professor Einstein would like uh to talk with you about the the paper wow so I went to see him and uh we
must have spent an hour and a half together and I was very much Ed by his presence uh I didn't get very much out of that uh conversation I only
remembered he repeatedly drew a curve which was very famous due to Maxwell a great physicist of the 19th
century and uh indeed uh Einstein's uh Einstein was deeply in the tradition of old physics
of classical physics two branches of that uh statistical physics and uh
electrodynamics were his uh great uh fors and uh using this tradition using
his uh deep perception in these two areas he launched the two and a half revolutions for physics
in the 20th century two and a half yes which was the half uh quantum mechanics okay the three revolutions were that's generally
accepted as the greatest revolution in physics uh after Newton it was special relativity general relativity and quantum
mechanics uh special and general relativity were invented by him MH essentially
alone quantum mechanics was the work of many people and so I count that as half a revolution okay by
Iran I I I'm unable to plumb the depths of physics or scale the heights of physics whichever it is um but I wonder if you could explain to us
non-physicists um the Yang Mills Theory
uh you know what the fundamental physics is about is uh to ask uh how
matter uh is put together in the 19th century finally people realized that everything is made
of uh atoms and molecules in the 20th century we learned that the uh molecules are made of atoms atoms are made of
protons and electrons and neutrons but uh what are protons and neutrons made of now we know they are made of
quarks so that is one aspect of what we do namely we want to take matter apart and look at the
constituents but there's another part of the Endeavor namely how these parts are put together the reason that they are
together is because there's a force between them force is in Daily Language in physics we call it the
interaction so the question is what are the interaction between these constituents uh interaction of
force uh it's well known already since Newton's time there's gravitational force and uh through the 19th century we
know there are electric and magnetic forces in the 20th century we know there are two additional kinds of forces they are called nuclear forces which are
responsible for the atomic bomb nuclear forces nuclear forces and the weak forces which are responsible for such
things like radioactivity so there are now four types of forces the question is what are the precise
nature of these uh four types we know that the gravity through Newton is a inverse Square law you probably learned
that in high school physics so you might say that the basic question that uh one of the basic questions one of the fundamental basic questions we face is
how are these three other forces structured they are not inverse Square laws but what are they and that's where
the young M Theory or gauge Theory comes in gauge Theory gives a principle which
uh uh governed how these forces are structured mathematically precisely and uh when M well
originally in 1918 and 1919 stimulated by Einstein Herman v a great mathematician uh proposed what is called
gauge Theory uh he used that to describe uh electricity and magnetism and that was
successful but it does not apply to the other two the nuclear forces and weak forces MH and what Ms and I did was we
generalized what the V did and that becomes a general principle of forces of why they are these forces
including gravity and that principle is now called the gauge principle M and the gauge principles detailed mathematical
structure is what uh we wrote down in 1954 at the time that we wrote it down nobody
believed uh that was it was important and we didn't know it was that important but we said that this is a beautiful idea and the mathematical structure is
very elegant so we published a paper about it and uh then 20 years later various experiments showed that that in fact was approximately the right
direction then after struggling for another five years it became clear that it's not just approximately right it is
exactly right so that became something which uh uh is now the universally accepted principle of how these forces
are formed 1954 yes how do you feel about that fact that
50 years later something that you created that you propounded has been so so fundamentally U has so fundamentally
changed to your field well of course I feel good about it but uh I tell my
students that uh the structure of uh uh everything uh often times has a hidden
uh Beauty in it if you can sense vaguely some of these Beauty uh do not let
go uh the reason that in 1954 Mir and I were able to do it as I told you it was not in agreement with
experiment and nobody believed this but we saw the beauty of the structure so we wrote it down the Elegance of structure that's right it's uh it's a oh by the
way I should add the following uh and that has something to do with stone book uh okay this uh y m theory was
published and uh gradually originally people didn't believe it gradually more and more people see the beauty of it so people began to work on it but it was
only in the 70s that it was confirmed by experiment and uh so by the 60s there
were not many papers but I would say every year there'll be 10 papers 20 papers about
it and uh I came to Stone in 1966 and one day it must be 68 or 69 I was giving a talk I I was giving a lecture no I was giving a course on
general relativity it's a graduate uh course and I wrote down on the Blackboard uh one long formula a famous formula called
the remon tensor Reon was one of the greatest mathematician of the 19th century and Reon tenser has something to
do with the Einstein's gravity Theory so I copied down on the Blackboard the P
this uh long P long formula of the remon tension as I was coping down it suddenly flashed through my mind that the
structure of this uh reong equation is very similar to the equation that Ms and I had written down when we wrote it down
in 1954 we didn't notice uh we were not uh doing general relativity so we didn't notice there was any
similarity but uh that uh Le during that lecture I found that they were very similar so after the class I went to my office and checked in detail and sure
enough they were not just similar they were exactly the same if you define some quantities correctly so I was a bit excited but I didn't understand it and
uh so I went to see Jim Simons Jim Simons as you know was the young department chairman of mathematics at Stone book and he was a great uh
geometer so he knew uh remon in Geometry very well so I went to his office we were still in that old red brick
building both his office and mine so I said Jim uh here's the reing formula that you are
very acquainted very familiar with and uh some years ago M and I wrote this formula look they are very similar and uh he thought about it for a
while he said that yes yes that's it's not strange they are both fiber bunders so I said what's a fiber bundle uh so he
gave me a book uh written by a famous uh princet the mathematician called stin Rod it's
called fiber bundus so I went back with book and uh but the book was impossible for me to understand uh the mathematicians have a tendency to write
very dry uh uh very abrupt statements they are precise but there is
no flesh to it so it's very difficult to it's all bones and is it's impossible to understand so I didn't understand so I
went back to Jim and said look this book is useless for physic but uh we want to understand what this fiber bundle business is
about and uh could you explain to me me what it is he said the fiber bundles is a new thing in mathematics too but earlier than in physics in starting in
the 40s there were already many papers in mathematics in fiber bundles and it's now a important branch of
geometry and so I said uh could you give us some lectures understandable to theoretical
physicist he said yes so he gave a series of lunch lectures uh
very uh informal there may be 10 of us uh faculty and graduate students of uh The Institute of theoretical physics here at
Stonebrook and uh as he must have uh talked for about a a whole month and that was very useful for us so at the
end of that um we decided to give him a gift for this uh uh series of lectures so
we chipped money together and decided uh to buy something for him and I went to Irving CW a
mathematician whom I knew very well I said Irving we want to give a Jim a gift what should we buy he said the Jim
cannot uh spell give him a dictionary so we bought a big dictionary and gave it to Jim and uh he told me
recently that he's still using it but uh what we learned from Jim in those uh lectures were very important
not only for me not only for stoneberg but in fact it launched a new
trend and that came about this way after I understood the gist of uh what the mathematicians were doing with fiber
bunders I realized indeed both general relativity of Einstein M and uh gaug
Theory were fiber bundles so I wrote a paper with TT of Harvard immediately after that in which
we we explain in detail the relationship between the mathematicians ideas and terminology and the physicist ideas and terminology and
so we made a little dictionary the little dictionary had only maybe 15 entries on the left side are
the physicist terminology on the right side all the mathematicians terminology and there was an exact correspondence so we call called it the dictionary but
there's one item which uh physicist used uh repeatedly its technical term is called
source source actually was due to the idea of source was due to Ampere you know the electric Uh current three amp
five amp yes that was named after the great French physicist 19th Cent Empire and uh
uh now in physics Empire's idea of a source was
a crucial concept so we have to have that in our dictionary on the physics part but on the mathematics part I went
to ask Jim what do you call this he said we don't deal with this concept so we left that the blank so it's a dictionary with maybe 15 entries on one side 14
entries on the other side and nothing to correspond to Source yes but then
uh ye singal from MIT a distinguished mathematician came to visit I had known him so I gave him a copy of our preprint
and he looked at it and there's this blank so he thought about it and decided that is a very interesting concept and they should deal with it
they somehow in their 20 or 30 years of dealing with the fiber bundles had never touched on this
idea so he went to England immediately and he was a great collaborator of uh a perhaps the greatest mathematician today
in Great Britain uh Michael AA it's now sir my CR at that time he was not a sir yet and uh so they looked at
it and found that this concept that they never used but we dealt with since ampire was most interesting that became
now a new branch of mathematics so they wrote a paper and because of the prestige and the fame of a teer and
singer many young mathematicians all began to look into this and now it is a thriving branch of modern mathematics
what do they call it uh well there are many names in particular a student of AA called uh
Donan uh did the Pioneer working it so it's called donon Theory but the all those are related to that blank
spot so in some sense you know know in the first half of the 20th century physics and Mathematics were divorced uh in early centuries physics
and Mathematics were in close collaboration but in the first uh half of the 20th century the mathematicians became more and more
abstract they in fact were very happy that they in fact one of them wrote a article saying that the greatest contrib
tion the greatest achievement of 20th century mathematics was that it finally liberated itself from the shackers of
physics that was by a famous mathematician but with this uh fiber BND business uh the mathematicians and the
physics are not coming together again so if you want to say how did that coming together come
about I would say that uh it has something to do with uh me and Jim and that Blank Spot in that dictionary and
with the stoner book so we are very happy that uh Jim continued to be interested in physics and math and you know now he's a billionaire and uh he
just announced he would give her $25 million to St that's great yeah so you I mean you have this is just
another way you have made connections in in your life uh not only connections having to do with matter but also yes uh
yeah interdisciplinary connections as well uh I moved back my former wife passed away in
203 I moved back to Beijing when I was growing up in Beijing as I told you before my father was a Prof professor at the Singa University
in Beijing uh one of the most uh prestigious universities in China and so I grew up on that U
campus uh in 19 in 203 after my former wife passed away I moved back to that campus and now I'm a professor of physics on that
campus and the Jim and Maryland came to visit us in 20 01 that's before my I moved back I was
uh already visiting that campus very frequently and Jim came and uh I remembered uh what happened
precisely after his visit I came back and he came back and I visit him and in his office here in soket I said uh what's your impression
of China oh he said uh he was very happy with the visit he said I figured the greatest
problem in the world today is poverty and here I see 1.3 billion people pulling themselves uh out of
poverty uh by their own bootstraps that's a great contribution not only to themselves but to the world so they deserve uh
our help what do you need so I said uh uh we have many
visitors in Beijing but the housing was lousy uh how about helping us to have some uh visits
housing so he gave a million dollars and now that the complex prices are still cheap in China
so that uh $1 billion sorry $1 million uh is suff sufficient to have
nine very nice Apartments build and is called CH Simon's hall because uh one of his great contributions to math and
physics was a paper he wrote with churn in the 1970s and uh he and Maryland recently went to uh Beijing
and uh open that Hall so I think that uh through the math physics connection uh there is now a Stonebrook
T connection too I wanted to ask you um you mentioned that when you came to the University of
Chicago from China you were you actually already knew some of the things that they were teaching at the time you were
very very well trained how do you U how do you see the uh the differences in education in in in the United States and in China
today that's a very important question and I've been reflecting on that uh I think there are very fundamental
differences and uh these fundamental differences uh show up on each side uh good points and bad
points uh you know that the the newspaper said that President Bush just
uh appointed the uh committee to study how to address the problem of uh
mathematics education in the primary and secondary schools in the United States
why because uh in many many many uh high school student mathematics examinations International
examinations with maybe 30 Nations the US always is near the bottom it's the Asian countries that are at the
top so of course that gets uh the Educators and the mathematicians worried here and that's why this uh appointment
uh why why is it that uh the US uh high school education in mathematics uh is
not as good it's because the whole educational philosophy and system are different the kids here [Music]
are uh are more treated as uh adults even though they were
young in China if you have a eight-year-old uh child and say you should do homework he or she would just
go to do the homework here if you have a eight or nine year old child and you say you should do homework he or she would say I don't
want to do it why not it's uninteresting is boring the concept that doing homework
might be boring does not exist in China so if you ask a child to do it he would just do it is this a matter of
discipline or something uh yes it's a discipline which is in the air so that the concept that that that a child would only do something that he or she is
interested in does not exist so that that's the difference now the consequence of that is that the kids are well trained they do lots of mathematics
exercises okay so that means the Chinese system is good no because if you go to China they're all discussing this Chinese system is no good all the kids
are trained too much a they have no free time and they cannot develop uh other interests B they have the tendency to
become robot-like they don't think for themselves so they are discussing Iden finding item how to change that system to be more like the American
system so after you have observed both these two you realize that this a very complicated thing it's in fact if
President Bush asks me what this mathematics committee can do I would tellar him they won't be able to do
anything because it's not the education system it's the whole society it's the whole value judgment it's whole idea of
how uh you educate the philosophy behind education is different and um so in fact I believe
that all that one can do on each side is to make small changes so as to most of the kids here uh are not uh
interested in mathematics I would say uh that's okay there's no reason for so many kids to be interested in mathematics but the system
must be such that for those who could be interested who could in fact be extremely interested you must provide the opportunity for them to get into it
on the other hand in China I would say that don't train all these kids all the time it it's too straight lighten up
yes uh so the I think a comparison of uh the educational system
the educational philosophy in the orient and in the United States is a very interesting and very deep subject given all that you've said why would a why
would a a student in China come to Stonybrook to study oh mostly
because graduate school in the United States is uh the best in the world today we were talking about in the last few minutes
about primary and secondary schools when it come to graduate education
the the US the best us uh graduate schools are absolutely the best in the world so so uh I always say that uh if
you have a bright uh child the best thing is for him to get a
good high school education in China a college education in China and get a good graduate education in the United
States I myself benefited exactly from that I had a very good college education
in China where the professors are very devoted they are very responsible they lead you through difficult
things uh going to Great depths and uh covering large areas that's why when I came to Chicago I had a tremendous Advantage compared with my fellow
American graduate students uh but on the other hand when I came to Chicago
I learned how to explore the Frontiers how to be creative in your
thinking about the Frontiers problems so I got the best of uh both words and I think that is I was fortunate and I
would recommend that to any young person who especially is interested in the Sciences I think this is a good note to uh to
turn it over to our audience and uh and find out if there are questions u in the audience U if you'd step up to the microphone if you have a question for Dr
Young uh you mentioned earlier that uh as time went on experimental and theoretical physics uh grew apart because of growing complexities within each of them I'm curious how you uh yourself decided which which one to go
into or did it just sort of happen naturally with the work you were doing experimental versus theoretical physics yes how did how did how they grew apart and how did you adapt to that uh no how
did he actually decide to go into theoretical physics how did you why did you decide to go into the theoretical Branch uh as I said experimental and
theoretical physics have both become so complex by the mid the 20th century uh
it's almost impossible to be EXP in both both and as I said the family was the last physicist who made
first grade contributions to both sides now I myself when I came uh to the United States I knew that I had a very
good grounding in theory I also knew that I had uh almost no knowledge in experimental physics so I said I must uh
broaden my educational basis so I decided I should write an experimental thesis here and
uh I so I worked in fact at Chicago for some 18 or 20 month months in the laboratory of Professor Allison Allison
was uh making a at that time a large accelerator it's about the size of this room uh it's a
400 kilovolt of water circuit and uh so he had maybe five or six graduate students and I became one
of them but quickly I learned that I'm no good at uh experimental physics uh when things go wrong I do not
know why they are wrong and uh I of also often times turn the wrong knob and uh do some very bad things to various
things so my fellow graduate students were all a little bit uh worried when I get close to any equipment uh but uh we were on good
terms because uh I could solve theoretical problems for them very easily uh but anyway after 18 or 20
months of work uh I was very frustrated because uh uh Allison gave me a problem and uh the experiment I was doing on
that problem was not uh going well and uh one day tellor came I had uh be in contact with tellor in theory and tellor
said uh I understand your experiment is not doing well I said right he said why do you stick to experiment you had
already written a paper a short paper uh in theory uh I can sponsor that uh as your thesis if you make it a
little bit longer so I said uh thank you very much I have to think about this because it was uh not according to my
plans for so long thinking about it for a few days I finally went back to him and said uh I accept your uh suggestion
and uh that was uh a very important thing in my life namely to learn what I'm good for what I'm not good for any other
questions I have a question because both of stoneberg and chinai University are very great University in the world and as a professor you have taught all of
the students in both universities and how could you how could you compare the students in both of University one is in
America and another is in China thank you comparing the uh the students in China at the college level with the students in America at the at the
college level yes I me undergraduate in undergraduate yeah yes how would you compare undergraduate you spoke of that's a very important uh topic uh
especially since uh I have some firsthand observation um I taught twice in ster book freshman
physics and I taught uh for one semester in 204 uh freshman physics at s University so I have a firsthand
knowledge about the Freshman students in physics here and in
Beijing uh uh T of course is uh one of the most difficult to get into universities in
China and uh so I found that uh there are two differences difference number one is that the students in uh
Chena are almost all very well trained they did lots of exercises in high school so
such things like uh analytic geometry or trigonometry is no problems for them
here uh at least half of my students here were not well trained in analytic geometry or
trigonometry they know the definitions but they cannot manipulate because they didn't do enough exercise so the first difference is that the the
high school training in China is much more rigorous than here the second difference is that
the the students in China in Singa University were very mature and very motivated they
were they knew they have to work hard they sort of uh appreciate uh that
uh what they want to do and they go full force at it for the stoneberg students I would say at least
half of them we still sort of uh wandering around without any specific aim in life this is I have thought about this
this is um again a product of the difference of uh the two societies now you cannot say which one
is necessarily better the Chinese system is better in training
a lot of people who would uh uh mature who would get channed into some uh wake of way of life which would
make them a useful citizens but uh the American system uh is more free and so therefore
the people's outlook on life on everything is uh uh is less
restrictive and uh the best of them are given enough opportunity so that they can prosper look at Bill Gates Bill gas
is able alone to create uh trillions of dollars not for not only for uh his company for the whole world so that kind
of uh uh Innovative Spirit of free spirit is the kind of things that the United States
educational system and Society is uh good at fostering and that's that's true all over the world I think the Europeans
the Japanese all Marvel at the great success of the United States system which produced all these uh uh
tremendous Innovations and as a consequence wealth okay thank you
questions um Professor uh you said uh to sense the beauty is important in the scientific research uh I want to ask uh
whether you have uh any tricks to sense the beauty can you tell us some you said the importance of sensing the beauty or
the the Elegance of in scientific work do you have any tricks uh that help you to uh to spot the beauty or the the
Elegance uh the the direct answer is certainly no
uh I think for a young person it is uh important and that uh the American
system is uh good good for this to allow uh
oneself to be interested in in quite a number of things and uh to
perceive some things some areas uh some directions that he or she is particularly interested
in and and uh if a person at a young age could uh latch on to something that he or she is interested in and uh fully
develop that that may be the way he or she would find the Elegance the beauty
the usefulness of some things uh it's uh the Chinese system is not good for this the Chinese system has
too much of a tendency to impose what the children what the school
what the society want the young person to look at and
uh discourage him or her to Branch out the American system is better in this respect so it's
uh uh uh I think there are good aspects and bad aspects of uh each system when
you choose is to discuss different directions of what you want to
push Dr Yang thank you very [Music] much
Loading video analysis...