Is It A Comet or Alien Technology?
By StarTalk
Summary
## Key takeaways - **God of the Gaps: Ancient to Modern**: Historically, unexplained phenomena were attributed to divine intervention, a concept termed 'god of the gaps.' This is paralleled today by attributing unexplained phenomena to aliens. [00:59], [03:21] - **Newton's God of the Gaps**: Isaac Newton invoked God to explain the stability of planetary orbits, not because his equations failed, but at the limits of his understanding, illustrating an early form of the 'god of the gaps' concept. [01:34], [02:26] - **Interstellar Visitors Are Expected**: The solar system is just one of many, and given the ejection of planets from other star systems, it's statistically likely that objects from interstellar space would eventually pass through ours. [05:58], [06:28] - **Anomalous Interstellar Objects**: Recent interstellar visitors have exhibited anomalous features, such as unusual trajectories and rotation rates, that do not fully align with current models for comets and asteroids. [06:46], [08:15] - **Caution Against Alien of the Gaps**: While acknowledging the possibility of aliens, it's more scientifically prudent to consider these interstellar objects as a new class of object requiring further study, rather than immediately concluding they are alien technology. [09:09], [09:25] - **Science Demands More Data**: Scientific progress relies on continuous data acquisition and rigorous analysis, including peer review, to mitigate biases and ensure interpretations are as objective as possible. [09:38], [10:00]
Topics Covered
- The 'God of the Gaps' has been replaced by 'Alien of the Gaps'.
- Newton invoked God only at the limits of his knowledge.
- We must resist swapping 'God of the Gaps' for 'Alien of the Gaps'.
- Saying 'I don't know' is powerful and leads to discovery.
- Interstellar objects require new understanding, not alien explanations.
Full Transcript
Aliens paying us a visit from another
star system. What's up with that?
Let's go back a few thousand years.
Consider that
people tried to understand the world
around them. And in so doing, every time
they got to a point that they didn't
understand,
in came the power of a god. Let's go
back to ancient Greece. Storms rose up
in the seas. Where did that come from?
How? Why? Do they have meteorology? No.
Do they understand barometric pressure?
No. Did they know anything about the
atmosphere? No. But they knew the will
of Poseidon. Poseidon would be rage
enraged by the behavior of people on the
shores. And that would account for what
they saw.
This assigning the glory and the wrath
of a deity to things we don't understand
is coined by philosophers as the god of
the gaps. It's actually got quite a
noble history when you think of it. One
of the greatest works of science ever
is Principia Mathematica. In there,
Newton unleashes the three laws of
motion, the laws of gravity. He's
figures out how the solar system works.
He's figuring out how do these planets
sustain their orbits. Are they pulling
on each other and in what way and how?
He figures all this out. But wait a
minute. Every time Earth goes around the
backside between the sun and Jupiter,
Jupiter's going to tug on it a little
bit. Comes back around again. Jupiter
tugs on it again. Jupiter has a strong
gravity. What's going to ultimately
happen to Earth's orbit in this
scenario? Earth's orbit will become more
and more elongated. The gravitational
tugofwar between the sun and Jupiter
will yank Earth out of its orbit,
destabilizing the solar system. Not only
Earth, the other planets as well. He
said, "Oh my gosh, this will take time,
but clearly the solar system is stable."
So he writes, "I don't can't understand
why it's stable cuz I know my equations
work.
So God must step in every now and then
to fix things." Now, you got to be
badass to invoke God at the limits of
your knowledge when you explain so much
with the equations you wrote. That by
Newton was a god of the gaps invocation.
He brought in God when there was
something about the natural world could
not explain and did not know. Notice
Newton did not invoke God to explain the
force of attraction between Earth and
the moon. He he nailed that. He wrote
down that equation that was working. He
didn't invoke God when he talked about
his three laws of motion. Force equals
mass times acceleration. That works. We
still use it today. He only invoked God
at the limits of his knowledge. So,
let's fast forward to the second half of
the 20th century on into the 21st
century. What happens? Well, we have
Hollywood. Nothing better than a good
sci-fi movie with aliens in it. And
aliens. They're aliens. So, they got
better technology than us, better
spaceships. They do stuff we can't do.
It appears to me that we live in a time
where God of the gaps has been
supplanted by alien of the gaps. I've
had people come up to me and say, "Where
did the pyramids come from?" And I say,
"Well, thinking the ancient Egyptians
built it. How could they have possibly
built that? That's too complicated. They
must have gotten help from aliens. Alien
of the gaps." So, this urge is strong
and I I get it and I I I feel it and I
want it to be true as well. I don't want
to use it as a substitute
for continuing to ask questions about
what you're looking at. I don't want to
use it as a substitute for the simple
statement, I don't know what it is.
That's powerful. If you don't know how
to say, "I don't know." That means
you're going to walk through life
requiring answers to everything. And you
know something, some of those answers,
many of those answers will just be shown
to be wrong because you are invoking an
answer when there isn't evidence to
support it. We see things in the sky we
can't explain. There's a light in the
sky and it moves rapidly. I I don't know
what it is. Investigate it. Let's get
more data. I'm all in. But the moment
you say, "I don't know what I'm looking
at,
therefore I know what I'm looking at.
I'm looking at aliens." That is a leap.
Oh my gosh, that's a leap.
And it's a leap I'm not prepared to
take. What's gotten a lot of attention
of late, deservedly, is we've had now
three visitors from interstellar space.
Love it. We've been looking for these
puppies for decades, by the way.
Everything in the solar system, the
planets, the moons, the comets, the
asteroids, all of it. If you calculate
how much energy it has,
it is contained within the solar system.
None of these objects have enough energy
to escape the gravitational pole of the
sun. The sun owns them. That's our
family. It's the solar system. So, we
learn about the planets. We go there. We
land on them. We land on the moons. We
land on the on the asteroid. We landed
on comets. We get data. So, we get a
sense of what these objects are. That
goes into our cataloges. We form our
hypotheses. We have some theories that
get tested. That's how science works.
Now, we have visitor from another star
system. Again, we've been looking for
these for decades. We expected it to
show up at some point. Here's the solar
system in orbit around the center of the
galaxy, drifting through space.
Something's bound to visit us that
escaped another star system. By the way,
models for the formation of our solar
system suggest that we might have been
born with many more planets than eight.
Upwards of a dozen, 15, 20, possibly as
many as 30 planets started in this solar
system. many of which had unstable
orbits, crashed into Jupiter, crashed in
the sun, or got ejected. You get ejected
with higher speed that could be
contained by the sun. They're out there
somewhere. We think that happens in
every star system that formed. So, some
of that junk at some point is likely to
pass through our star system, the solar
system. Okay, so three objects have been
found in the last decade. Okay, three of
them. And
they've had some anomalous features.
Fun. I love it. The first of these MUA
MUA discovered with telescopes in
Hawaii. That's a Hawaiian word for first
scout basically. So that as it came
through the solar system, we said all
right, we know what trajectory an object
with that speed and that direction
coming in should take as it rounds the
sun. Then there was the actual
trajectory which was different like whoa
whoa. Well, comets have a way of
outgassing when they get near the sun,
and that puts an extra little sort of
force on their arc of motion that has
them move in ways that are not purely
gravitational. And that's true for all
comets. So, we maybe that's outgassing,
but suppose you look and there's no
outgassing. So, what's going on? Well,
that's fun.
We don't understand it. Not initially.
So, what's your first thought? Is it
aliens? That could be. Like I said, it's
not my first thought. It I promise you
it will be my last thought, but it's not
not in the list. It's in the list. This
is way down based on the history of
trying to understand things that we
don't understand. We have two more
objects that have come through and they
have some weird properties. The
brightness, the rotation rate, and so
they don't match some of our models for
what comets and asteroids should do.
Whatever anomalous behavior these
objects exhibit, I'm delighted that
they're finally in the catalog and we'll
figure it out one day, maybe.
And but while my first thought is not
that it's aliens,
I promise you that is one of my
thoughts, but it'll be last on the list.
It's easier for me to recognize
that interstellar objects are
fundamentally different from anything
we've studied in the solar system
before. So we have to
derive a new understanding
of what an object can be as it moves
from one star system to the next.
It's easier for me to think this is a
new kind of object that requires way
more study than we've given it thus far
than to say aliens did it. aliens.
Based on my read of history, and I do a
lot of reading of history, I have a
certain resistance to swapping out God
of the Gaps and replacing it with Alien
of the Gaps.
That's just me. Regardless,
in science, you always want more data.
Always. You need more data. You want
better data. You want different kinds of
data, different kinds of telescopes,
different kinds of observations,
different people observing it. Often a
person might have a bias that can
influence how they interpret what they
see or how they even measured what they
see. The good thing about science is we
have built-in error-checking mechanisms.
One of them is peer review. That's one
of them. Someone looks over your
shoulder say, "What are you doing?"
That's one kind of peer review. Street
peer review. What the hell are you
doing?
No, it's more formal than that
obviously, but you get someone else to
sort of check up on you. They're really
checking for your biases because as
science, we know we are humans just like
anybody else and we carry biases. So,
you don't want your bias creeping into
either your acquisition of data, your
analysis of the data, or your
interpretation of the data because some
other scientists will call that out.
You wanted to be sort of as straight as
you can.
And once you did all your homework,
sure, you can speculate. Go ahead. But
the speculation should trigger more
observations. Good speculations will do
that. You want to know what's up with
that aliens coming to visit Earth?
Maybe,
but based on my read of history,
unlikely.
And that's another edition of Star
Talks. What's up with that? Till next
time, keep looking up.
Loading video analysis...