Microsoft’s CEO Says Everyone Is Wrong
By David Carbutt
Summary
## Key takeaways - **74% CFOs Expect AI Gains, Only 5% See Them**: A Gartner survey shows 74% of CFOs in big corporations believe in significant efficiency gains and cost advantages through AI, but only 5% have already seen any efficiency gain or cost effect because of AI. [00:23], [00:32] - **40% AI Projects Fail by 2027**: Gartner predicts that by 2027, 40% of AI tools and projects used by corporations will have failed due to issues like poor data and unchanged workflows. [00:54] - **Four Essentials: Mindset, Tools, Skills, Data**: Companies need a mindset for business process re-engineering with AI, a new tool set, skills to apply the tools, and normalized data sets across systems that aren't captive to existing setups. [02:46], [03:37] - **Agents Manage Fiber Repairs at Scale**: Microsoft built as much data center capacity in the last period as in the first 15 years of Azure, and a fiber operator built a full agentic system to manage repairs of physical fiber assets that get cut, handling the scale without manual interaction. [02:13], [04:44] - **Shift from Chatbots to Autonomous Agents**: Stop thinking of AI as just a smart chatbot that writes emails and start seeing it as an autonomous worker, an agent that manages tasks humans physically can't handle anymore. [04:30] - **Future Jobs: Manage AI Agents**: The future job market is about becoming a manager of digital workers like AI agents; you won't be paid to type data into a spreadsheet but to supervise the agent that does it and architect the workflow. [05:54], [06:11]
Topics Covered
- 95% of CFOs Wrong on AI Gains
- Agents Replace Humans at Scale
- AI Demands Business Process Re-engineering
- Normalize Data Beyond Silos
- Manage Agents, Not Tasks
Full Transcript
Microsoft CEO just explained why 95% of companies are missing the mark on AI and why that is an enormous opportunity.
Everybody is talking about productivity, efficiency gains. If it is about
efficiency gains. If it is about artificial intelligence, very few people talk about quality and uh new tasks and so on. But let's stick to the to the
so on. But let's stick to the to the productivity and efficiency. I saw a Gartner survey that was really interesting. uh they said that 74% of
interesting. uh they said that 74% of the CFOs in big corporations believe in the significant
efficiency gains and cost advantages through AI but only 5% have already seen any efficiency gain or cost uh effect
because of AI. How do you explain that gap? So do we miss the the capabilities
gap? So do we miss the the capabilities to deal with AI? By the way, the Gartner survey was on another level also very uh
pessimistic. They said by 27, 40% of AI
pessimistic. They said by 27, 40% of AI tools and projects that have been used by corporations will have failed. Uh how
how do you where does this new kind of skepticism come from and how do you see the gap between CFOs optimism and real cost advantages?
>> Yeah. No, I think that's a great question and in fact this is probably one of the fundamental things that'll cause I'll call it firm level differences right I mean when I just
speak for myself at Microsoft I mean this is making massive productivity changes whether it's in our customer service whether it's in our supply chain operations you talked about finance or in finance forecasting there isn't I
mean every day in fact it's no longer even the top down it's the bottom up uh revolution that in some sense is happening which is taking out drudgery improving the quality of the outcomes,
improving the flow of work. Uh right,
somebody like like just to give you one little example, we are building I mean know we've become a very capital intensive industry as you would have may have noticed and so we're building all
these data centers. We have 500 plus fiber operators around the world. Uh and
fiber at the end of the day is a physical asset. Things happen to it,
physical asset. Things happen to it, right? They get cut or what have you and
right? They get cut or what have you and someone has to repair it. uh and it's a very manual interaction with even the fiber operators. So the person who is
fiber operators. So the person who is like basically managing all of that internally built a full agentic system to deal with all of that right uh because that's the only way because if
you think about it we grew as much DC capacity uh in the last as in the first 15 years of Azure I mean it's pretty crazy in the sense of the scale so the
only way we can manage that type of scale is by using some of these tools but to your point though Matias which is I think very very important to your Gartner report or what have you. I think
that there are four or five things that companies have to learn. One is a mindset. The mindset is not about sort
mindset. The mindset is not about sort of applying AI uh just to what you have today, but it's the change management that can has to be imagined with AI. So
that first thing is you kind of have to you know in the '9s we used to talk about business process re-engineering.
Guess what? It's time to think about business process re-engineering mindset.
The second thing you do need is a new tool set, right? So you kind of have, you know, that's the type of stuff that we can provide or what have you, but you got to equip yourself with a new set of
tools that then can be applied to the new process. Then you need the skills to
new process. Then you need the skills to apply the tool. Um, right? And that to me is the combination. And by the way, then you need data sets. The data sets
can't be captive to your existing system. So you have to normalize the
system. So you have to normalize the data across multiple systems. So if you really think about composing that mindset, tool set, skill set and data
set then and then go and apply oh I have a new evaluation, right? That's kind of how you do these AI systems. So there's a lot of learning, right? So if if you
go and say I'm going to approach it like any other IT project from even last year, it's going to fail uh by definition. And so that's where I think
definition. And so that's where I think a lot of the hard work that's got to be done at the economy level is the replplumbing of the IT skill set. Uh and
that's kind of hard because that's change management. It requires
change management. It requires enlightened leadership. It requires
enlightened leadership. It requires people to get reskilled and then scope the projects appropriately, pick the projects appropriately. We need to stop
projects appropriately. We need to stop thinking of AI as just a smart chatbot that writes emails and start seeing it as an autonomous worker, an agent that
manages tasks humans physically can't handle anymore. Nadella shares a wild
handle anymore. Nadella shares a wild stat. Microsoft built as much data
stat. Microsoft built as much data center capacity in the last 18 months as they did in the first 15 years combined.
To manage the physical optic fiber cables for all that growth, they didn't just hire more people. They built an agent system. This system actively
agent system. This system actively manages the repairs and maintenance of the physical network without constant human handholding. This is the
human handholding. This is the difference between a chatbot and an agent and it changes everything about how we work. A chatbot is like a library asset. It sits at your desk and waits
asset. It sits at your desk and waits for you to ask a specific question. It
is reactive. An agent is like a junior employee who walks around the office looking for things to fix. If a fiber cable breaks, the agent notices the problem, figures out the solution,
creates a work order, and calls the repair crew, all without a human boss telling him or her what to do. The
reason this matters is speed and scale.
When a company grows as fast as Microsoft is right now, there literally aren't enough humans to check every wire and switch. If they tried to do this the
and switch. If they tried to do this the old way where a human has to approve every step, the whole system would crash under its own weight. Humans get tired, we miss details, and we are slow. Agents
don't sleep and they can watch a million things at once. This means the future job market isn't about doing the busy work yourself. It's about becoming a
work yourself. It's about becoming a manager of those digital workers. You
won't be paid to type data into a spreadsheet. You'll be paid to supervise
spreadsheet. You'll be paid to supervise the agent that types the data. You
become the architect of the workflow deciding what the agent should focus on.
If you are just using tools, you are behind. You need to be managing
behind. You need to be managing outcomes. But even if you have this
outcomes. But even if you have this amazing technology, Nadella admits that most companies will fail because they're trying to put a jet engine on a horse and car. But an expensive AI technology
and car. But an expensive AI technology is useless if your company's data is messy and your teams don't know how to share information. Nadella lists four
share information. Nadella lists four things you must fix before AI works.
Mindset, tools, skill set, and data set.
He specifically mentions that data can't be captive. This backs up the Gartner
be captive. This backs up the Gartner stat predicting that 40% of AI projects will fail by 2027. They fail not because the AI is broken, but because the
business uses bad data or refuses to change old habits. Imagine you hire a super smart robot chef to cook a five-star dinner, but your kitchen is a disaster zone. The ingredients are
disaster zone. The ingredients are hidden in random boxes. The fridge is locked and the recipes are written in a secret code that only one person understands. That is part of what
understands. That is part of what Nadella is calling a data silo. Most
companies have their information trapped in different computer programs that don't speak the same language. The sales
team has one list and the shipping team has a totally different list. If the AI can't read all those files at the same time, it can't do its job. It will give you wrong answers because it only sees
half the picture. And this is why Nadella talks about replplumbing the business. It's not fun and it's not the
business. It's not fun and it's not the flashy part of AI. It's the boring hard work of organizing years of digital files and forcing different departments to share their secrets. This is also a
people problem, not just a computer problem. Employees often hoard
problem. Employees often hoard information because they think it makes them valuable. Microsoft CEO is saying
them valuable. Microsoft CEO is saying that for AI to work, that culture has to die. You have to break down the walls
die. You have to break down the walls between teams. If you skip this hard step and just buy the AI software, you don't get a faster business, you just get a faster mess. Success in 2025 comes
from the mindset that AI is a power tool. It needs a clean workshop and a
tool. It needs a clean workshop and a skilled operator. If you're trying to
skilled operator. If you're trying to understand AI, but the whole space feels overwhelming, I've built a course that walks you through it from the ground up.
It covers the basics, the models, the hardware, and even more advanced topics like compute and physical AI. And once
you join, you get lifetime access. As we
add modules, we will be increasing the price. So, it's currently at the lowest
price. So, it's currently at the lowest price it will ever be. If you're
interested, check out the link in the description. Cheers. One of our clients
description. Cheers. One of our clients started with zero audience. Now they're
doing $100,000 months thanks to YouTube.
And they're not alone. We've helped
three businesses hit that level just by growing them a YouTube channel. Want to
see how this could work for your business? Book a call with me below.
business? Book a call with me below.
Loading video analysis...