The Playbook: Lessons from 200+ Company Stories
By Acquired
Summary
## Key takeaways - **Optimism is rational and drives progress.**: Even in bleak times, optimism is the rational choice because it's the optimists who drive the world forward and achieve outsized returns. [08:06] - **Exponential growth feels like nothing, then everything.**: Moore's Law and market cap growth show that exponential progress often appears stagnant until suddenly, everything happens at once. [12:00], [13:00] - **Let winners ride by assessing remaining growth runway.**: The key to long-term success isn't the current growth rate, but the number of years of growth a company has left, emphasizing the importance of massive, globally addressable markets. [19:54], [20:51] - **Will to survive can overcome any adversity.**: Company building is a hero's journey where survival is only dependent on the founder's will, not external market forces. [22:30], [23:24] - **Focus on product, not infrastructure.**: Companies should concentrate on attributes that enhance their product's value to customers, outsourcing non-core infrastructure like power generation to utilities. [48:38] - **Scale up or niche down; avoid the middle.**: The internet punishes companies caught in the middle by enabling both massive scale for dominant players and deep niches for specialized businesses. [53:36], [54:54]
Topics Covered
- Solana's Vision: A Global Computer at the Speed of Light
- Solana's Energy Efficiency: A Million Times Better Than Proof-of-Work
- Bear Markets Are Great for Seed-Stage Companies
- Bezos's Beer Analogy: Outsource Infrastructure to Focus on Core Value
- The Unregulated Utility Model: A Defensible Path to Profitability
Full Transcript
all right
two episodes in a row from a hotel room
let's do it
let's do it
who got the truth
is it you is it you is it you who got
the truth now
is it you is it you is it you sit me
down say it straight another story on
the way who got the truth
welcome to this special episode of
acquired the podcast about great
technology companies and the stories and
playbooks behind them i'm ben gilbert
and i'm the co-founder and managing
director of seattle-based pioneer square
labs and our venture fund psl ventures
and i'm david rosenthal and i am an
angel investor based in san francisco
and we are your hosts
this episode is something that david and
i have been thinking about for a long
time years in fact it is called the
acquired playbook
and it is basically what we've learned
from doing acquired like people often
ask us the question okay cool you guys
have analyzed like 200 companies and
spent an ungodly amount of hours doing
that like what are the takeaways
this episode
is the takeaways
it was back in like 2018 i want to say
that we had a major book publisher come
to us and be like hey would you want to
do a book out acquired this was the idea
we had and then we were just like maybe
at some point let's just keep doing
episodes instead but maybe at some point
so consider this the first draft we
don't know if this talk was good yet we
are in our hotel rooms at capital camp
and we are about to go on stage and give
it so this is sort of fun this is the
first time we've ever recorded one of
these before doing the episode itself
and
before we jump in for one final time
this season a huge thank you to our
presenting sponsor of all of our special
episodes the solana foundation and
solana as you all definitely know by now
is a global state machine and the
world's most performant blockchain and
when we say performant that means that
developers can build web3 applications
on top of it with super low transaction
fees compared to other infrastructure
platforms out there you may know of and
the reason that you can do that is that
the solana blockchain is literally
a feat of engineering genius if only we
could talk to people involved in the
engineering genius behind solana you
know where i'm going with this because
it's the last special episode of the
season i am talking to the co-founders
of solana itself
anatoly yaakoventko and raj
gokul
we are pumped to close out the season
here with you guys there's a quick
refresher can you tell us what the
solana network was built to accomplish
it's a public blockchain so it was
billed as a faster
version of ethereum and that's kind of
very very high level way to talk about
it but our initial vision like the slide
deck and everything in those super early
days said that it's blockchain and
nasdaq speed and
the big dream idea is imagine you have a
global computer
that doesn't matter where you're at
but this computer
perfectly synchronizes all information
on it as close to the speed of light as
possible so when news travels around the
world you know so does the information
through this thing because if you can
get to that speed of light update speed
you are as fast as news you're as fast
as the fastest markets it doesn't really
matter if you know nasdaq has like sub
nanosecond whatever trading because that
doesn't trade on news it's just trading
a statistical noise the other thing
about solana is it's very very energy
efficient so single solano transaction
is about like two or three google
searches
so if you think of it as using a web
service this is a network that
you know takes as much energy as a
regular web service in comparison to the
proof of work chains this is like a
million times more energy efficient to
me entourage this was really important
that that was true
that's amazing and we got all into in
our
episode with y'all a year ago into your
background as a systems engineer at
qualcomm and leading into
the proof of history and how the network
is architected what's happened with
solana since
oh man a lot of ups some downs we've had
crazy amount of traction i think by a
number of active accounts
we've passed
all the other chains yeah right now
we're at two million daily uh six
million weeklies and then 18 million
monthlies which is the highest of any
blockchain and passed all the other ones
about
60 days ago and last time
we spoke we're basically close to zero
in the midst of all this incredible
growth the markets and in particular the
crypto markets have changed quite a bit
since we spoke last as well you started
solana in the middle of the last crypto
winter what advice would you have for
founders out there
so bear markets are hard for like
mid-stage companies because
they see their like revenues and
everything else shrink but i think
they're actually great for seed level
companies that are
just
small teams of engineers with you know
running in ramen
that have a bright idea and a lot of
energy to go execute on it your
competitors that are bigger are forced
to prioritize and forced to take less
risk four people that are just really
hungry to build the next big thing don't
need a lot of funding and that was our
story we actually had a lot of
competitors that raised
100 million rounds like with on a white
paper right before we got like a little
bit of seed funding the first deed was a
little over 3 million
and that was more or less enough the
next round was like 13 but a ton of it
got wiped out because most of it came in
and heath
and before we found a custodian and were
able to sell any of it a lot of that
value got wiped out unfortunately it
says altogether like less than 10
million i think to mainnet
wow for teams out there that are working
on applications
what's the best way to get in touch with
y'all and how can solana help
so we have a discord we have a really
strong community there if you're a
builder you should definitely join that
one also like anchor there's a lot of
groups outside of just our main one
one kind of more
fun way to do it would be to join any of
the hacker houses just show up and start
building with a bunch of people face to
face and like really feel the energy of
you know working on something together
and like exchanging ideas and seeing
things fail
awesome thank you so much it's an
amazing feat be the largest blockchain
out there super cool our hat is off to
you
now as always this is not financial
advice please do your own research dave
and i do lots of research but you may
come to different conclusions and we may
have financial interests in the things
that are discussed on this show indeed
and speaking of
different conclusions
this would be a fantastic episode to
discuss in the acquired slack we want to
hear what your favorite lessons are from
all of these like hundreds and hundreds
of hours that we've done at this point
this would be awesome so acquired.fm
slack if you're not already a member we
hang out in there it's a great great
great community as you will hear us talk
about in this talk all right join the
slack and then uh this is 12 of our
favorite playbook themes but there are
certainly more so i'd love to hear from
you all right on to the talk
so we thought we would be really clever
here with our first one both because
this genuinely is one of our favorite
themes and we thought hell this will be
counter-positioned everybody's going to
talk about you know it's may 2022
there's doom and gloom it's gonna be
good and then of course
great friend of the show hanu harharan
came up earlier tonight and
already beat the optimism drum but
we will highlight it once again so our
first
lesson
from all the stories we've told is that
optimism always wins so um
uh for folks here in the auditorium
raise your hand if you know who the
people are who are on this slide
wow this is awesome we're getting almost
no hands raised
for folks at home bear with us i don't
know that we have a single hand up wow
this is awesome okay so
the person on the left is akio morita
and the person on the right is masaru
ibuka and they were the co-founders of
the sony corporation
and uh we told this story in about three
hours uh earlier this year on acquired
it is it is amazing but we thought it
would be the perfect story to kick off
the night because it's it's just so
perfect for this moment so
as we said there's not a lot of reasons
looking out at the landscape but the
markets right now to be an optimist
but the sony story reminds us that
things were much
much much worse than they are today in
the recent past so
sony was founded in
1946 in japan and uh just think about
that time in 1946 in japan
you think 2022 in america might be a bad
time to start a company or a tough time
to start a company i don't know that in
recent history there has been a worse
time and place
to
try and live your life and do any sort
of business let alone start a brand new
innovative technology firm right so
these two men decided to start a company
which is crazy in and of itself in japan
in 1946
even crazier they decided to start a
consumer electronics company
crazy for two reasons one
after the war there was no technology
left in japan so like what were they
gonna what were they gonna make their
first product was a wooden rice cooker
there wasn't uh a market either because
every other technology firm that was
making radios and stuff had pivoted to
make stuff for the military which was no
longer a customer yes no longer existed
the second reason why this was a
completely
completely crazy idea
was
they were going to make
consumer electronic electronic consumer
products the gdp per capita in japan in
1946 was 17
not 17 000 it was 17
so there was no market there was no
technology and i think after the war
48 of tokyo was homeless
like half the population's homes had
been destroyed yeah
unbelievable and so and yet despite all
that despite
i can't even imagine bigger headwinds
against them they built one of the most
iconic companies in the world
it's not an understatement to say that
these two men and sony changed the
course of japanese history changed the
course of world history and
again we talked about this on the
episode but uh steve jobs was mentioned
earlier tonight
akio marita was the inspiration for
steve jobs uh and he actually did this
great great talk at um one of uh it was
uh not a wwdc uh an apple
after maria passed away where he did a
tribute to him and i think uh you know
no morita no sony no iphone um and so
the lesson that we take away from this
is like you know
even if things are at their bleakest
it's rational to be an optimist because
if you're not an optimist it's it's the
optimists who drive the world forward
and then if you're an investor investing
in optimism is the only way that you're
actually going to make outsized returns
and build great companies so it is
genuinely the rational thing to do
all right so point one here lesson one
uh
touchy-feely kind of feel good
but let's back it up a little bit
so
we all know moore's law
this next lesson
you know we wanted to basically
visualize and talk about this trend in a
little bit of a different way than than
it's normally talked about so the the
number of transistors on a chip we all
know this tends to double every 18 to 24
months and with some quick compounding
math that means you get a 10x
every seven years or so and as you can
see on this graph that we made here uh
the x-axis is time the y-axis is the
number of transistors on a leading
consumer processor uh notice that it's
in log scale you can see every seven
years or so 10x improvement and
processing power and i figured we'd take
the sort of greatest hits examples uh
intel's 386 486 pentium 4 core 2 duo
which was in my first macbook pro the a7
in the iphone in 2013 and of course the
recent apple m1
uh of course if you look at it in linear
and not log scale it looks like this
it's way too difficult to actually
observe any progress and it seems like
basically nothing happened and then
everything happened and this is the
craziest thing about moore's law and
exponential scales the graph always
looks like this right in 10 years the m1
is going to look like nothing happened
between and in 2000 with pentium 4 it
would have looked like this too yeah it
totally every single step along the way
felt like this which is wild and because
of how exponential growth works you
basically feel like you're always at
this crazy top and all this progress
just happened
but normally we don't look at charts
like this when we're looking at at
processing power or at least like
processing generations
we're used to looking at it for
high-growth durable technology companies
when we're looking at stuff like their
market cap so we aggregated that too
um the first thing to note is that
there's been a drawdown i don't know if
anyone noticed since we made these
slides a few months ago
but the point still holds this is the
market cap of all global technology
companies over that same time period
starting in 1975
even if you normalize this for the tech
bubble and today you'll see that the
outcomes of venture-backed technology
companies keep getting larger generation
by generation
uh it's also worth observing the exact
same phenomenon that basically it seems
like nothing happened say for the tech
bubble
and then suddenly everything happened at
once and
the insight is that this
graph and the moore's law chart with the
processors are actually the same thing
this is actually moore's law at work and
so we call this lesson the mike moritz
corollary to moore's law because we
didn't make it up there's a great story
that goes with it around the time that
mike moritz and doug leone took over
running sequoyah capital from don
valentine mike looked back on the
performance of the past couple of
sequoia funds that had cisco oracle
apple these unbelievable venture returns
never before seen venture returns
and they were asking themselves going
you know my god what if i got myself
into how are we ever going to top this
which would be a reasonable and rational
way to respond looking at the greatest
returns in history in an asset class and
thinking
okay where do we go from here
but he realized as long as moore's law
continues to hold and computing power
continues to get exponentially cheaper
the markets that technology can attack
should keep getting bigger and bigger so
to put some more numbers behind this in
1990 a pc with that 486 processor cost 2
000
and only about 42 of america that's just
of america used a computer at all which
is that's
wild right that recently uh so today a
smartphone with you know literally a
million times of the computing power
cost two hundred dollars which is one
tenth the cost and over six billion
people have one so of course this trend
led sequoia to go on to invest in google
whatsapp airbnb meitwan bite dance
global markets
but i think this is like
this insight that that mike had
originally of like oh as long as moore's
law holds yeah there'll be ups and downs
in the market like we've observed in the
past year but
technology should always be able to
access bigger and bigger and bigger
markets if the cost of compute keeps
declining and it's played out and for
those of you in the room who want to get
like really pedantic you have to sort of
slightly adjust moore's law in order to
say that it still holds you change the
definition a little bit but when you
look at like what nvidia's been doing
with gpus it is totally fair to say that
this
10x improvement in computing every five
six seven years that is absolutely still
happening and so therefore the lessons
you should take from it on the macro
technology scale are to stay an optimist
indeed indeed
all right so number three we talk about
sequoia a lot on acquired they've been
involved in so many great winners
they've built such a great great
franchise but lest you think that they
are just
pure geniuses they can do no wrong
the lesson number three which is cue the
all-in theme song here let your winners
ride
uh this comes from sequoia's biggest
mistake in history which their biggest
mistake in history in one of the most
successful companies if not the most
successful company in history yes and uh
i think this is probably the single
biggest mistake period in investing in
history yeah i don't see i don't think
there's any way that it can't be
definitionally uh so let's go on to the
next slide
now to be fair to sequoia they're
playing on the stage where they could
make
a mistake that was the single biggest in
history so they're doing something right
but
uh so the story goes one day in the late
1970s i think it was 1977
nolan bushnell
called up uh who was the ceo of atari
called up don valentine his main venture
investor and atari was actually the very
first sequoia capital investment after
don started the firm and he said hey
i've got this young kid that's been
working for me here at atari his name's
steve jobs and he started a company and
i think you should meet him i think you
should take a look at him and
don talks about this in the way that
only only don can says that steve came
in and he quote looked like ho chi minh
and i think this was during the phase
where he wasn't showering so like he
smelled really bad
but uh they funded him anyway
uh don invested 150 000
in apple computer in 1977 and then
18 months later they had an opportunity
to realize one of the greatest venture
returns of all time they made a 40x
on that investment they sold their
shares for six
million dollars before the ipo and they
completely cleared out their position
in apple
and of course we all know what happens
since and uh we uh the next slide we uh
we just for fun we we said we put on
where our friends ted and todd over at
uh at berkshire uh with warren's
approval started buying and uh you have
the hair beating the uh are you the
tortoise certainly beating the hair on
the tortoise beating the hair indeed and
uh
yeah i think they did better than than
quite did on this one
so no you know because we use one
gigantic global most successful
technology company of all time to
illustrate this we figured we'd pick
another example too just to show it's
not an isolated incident so uh amazon
ipod at eight dollars per share and just
for fun i want to point out that
subsequent run up there in the dot com
bubble to 120 a share then of course
that crash from the dot-com bubble so
2001 to 2003 there
looks like a pretty amazing buying
opportunity but actually that's a
ludicrous statement because every year
for the next two decades was a great
buying opportunity in this company and
so
what are we illustrating here
if you had held that amazon ipo share
for 13 years you would have a nice 10x
from the beginning of this graph to the
end of this graph
but you really should have continued to
hold if you zoom out here so you can see
that the little crosshairs there
illustrate uh where the previous graph
ended
basically any growth of the stock before
2012 just looks cute
and uh you know at that point in 2012 i
think we all would have described amazon
as a mature company
uh it was almost 20 years old if you had
just held for another 10 years then
instead of that 10x in 13 years you
could have had a
170x and of course the difference
between those two on an absolute dollar
basis you know whatever you invested at
ipo is incredibly meaningful incredibly
meaningful and and the so the key
insight this and letting your winners
ride and you know when to let your
winners ride and when not
it's not your growth rate in any given
year that matters frankly that doesn't
matter at all uh what matters is how
many years of growth do you have left
like that is the ultimate question and
in the case of amazon in the case of
apple
if you have
decades of growth left
again that's all that matters
it leaves you in this interesting place
where you're thinking well okay do i
always continue to hold
and this is why venture capitalists tend
to be totally obsessed with market size
because it's this idea that like you
basically need to be able to run forever
or decades and decades and decades and
continue to grow and those markets
continue to be this globally addressable
absolutely massive opportunity because
the compounding the funny thing about it
is all of the value tends to show up in
the out years and the trick is figuring
out like okay when am i in the out years
yep and so there's this great uh like
everything in uh in startups there's a
great paul graham quote to go along with
it of course he remarked in december
2020 that an astonishing 99.98 of
amazon's growth had happened since ipo
and uh
i just love this because i i actually
printed it out and i have it at home it
reminded me like how much
yeah
just how much running room amazon had
ahead of it after it's ipo
all right number four
one of our very favorites i love this
picture of jensen huang showing off his
nvidia logo tattoo that he has on his
shoulder i think it's from the tegra 2
processor line like name a more badass
tech ceo than jensen huang i think he
might be more badass than
elon i i mean they both wear leather
jackets so
our number four lesson is nothing can
stop a will to survive and the reason
that we put jensen on this slide
one is because his will to survive is
unparalleled uh we'll tell the story in
a minute um but two we actually started
our two-part series on nvidia with this
great quote from him which is that my
will to survive exceeds everybody else's
will to kill me
so
one of the key things that we realized
looking back on all the stories that
we've told um
we kind of have a formula at acquired it
just happens to be like the best formula
of all time and it's joseph campbell and
it's the hero's journey and all the
great companies whether it's apple or
amazon or nvidia or tsmc they're all the
hero's journey
and
the thing about the hero's journey is
you face adversity along the way you're
fighting a dragon it looks like you're
gonna die
and uh the thing about company building
is that unlike fighting dragons
game over only happens when you decide
to quit as a founder like you can't get
eaten by the dragon like the market can
turn against you but the market can't
actually eat you there is always
always a way to survive it's just a
question of do you have the will to do
that and uh the nvidia story just
illustrates that better than anybody so
when they were funded sequoia funded
them uh shocking shocking right uh
it was uh jensen uh and a couple of his
buddies from sun jensen was at lsi logic
and uh his two co-founders were from sun
this amazing technical team
this new market graphics accelerating
and gaming on pcs
giant wave led by doom and home adoption
of pcs this was like a you know great
team to pursue it can't miss investment
no-brainer venture bet no brainer why
the venture capitalists bet on everyone
over and over and over and over which is
the problem with no-brainer venture bets
everybody thinks they're no-brainer
venture bets and tons of competition
80 separate companies making graphics
cards got funded yeah it was 70 or 80
separate companies making graphics cards
all got funded which sounds quaint today
but that was a lot back then and then it
gets even worse
intel came after the graphics card
industry and decided that they were
going to integrate graphics into the
motherboard which they had done with you
know sound chips and networking chips
and everything else like how many people
have a dedicated networking card in
their pcs these days you know nobody
so put yourself in jensen and nvidia's
shoes here you just got funded it's not
a lot of capital a zillion other people
just got funded with the exact same
amount of capital that you have uh
we don't have this in our sort of
discussion here so i'm i'm freewheeling
but um it's worth knowing that nvidia's
original approach to how they wanted to
render graphics on cards was actually
basically wrong it was novel but it was
like not the way that everyone else
decided to go and so it was difficult to
program for
quadrilaterals as polygons instead of
triangles as polygons yes which is
not as efficient as a three-sided shape
anyway uh i had had a lot of merits so
not only are you
not on the same footing as everyone else
who you're competing against for a pure
commodity on a thing that takes 18 to 24
months to ship
you are a step behind because you've
burned a bunch of capital chasing the
wrong approach first
totally so what did they do uh jensen
laid off 70 of the company
and they did two completely crazy things
that if you're not just focused on
survival like you wouldn't do these
things
one he decided that the only way they
were gonna
win and survive was in this brutal
commodity industry was by shipping six
months ahead shipping new technology six
months ahead of their competitors and
the way they did that
was they decided they were just gonna
yolo it so they designed all of their
chips in software emulation as opposed
to what everybody else did which was
they'd work with their foundry partners
and they'd get some prototype chips made
and they'd send them over from asia and
they test them out they make sure they
worked
nvidia said no we don't have time for
that they literally only ever
ran the chip in software and then once
that passed send it to the production
run
and then the other thing that they did
which we didn't talk about this as much
on the episode is uh
of course you're gonna have a lot of
errors and defects by doing this so like
a large percentage of those chips
like the chips worked sort of in
aggregate but like a lot of functions
that you would want to call as a game
developer just didn't work
so they were like ah it's a feature not
a bug we're gonna go simplify your life
as game developers so they would ship
them broken and they would just disable
that they would make it so that you
couldn't access that in software and
then they would go around all the
developers and say
yeah you just actually don't want to use
that blend mode
trust us trust us like i feel like
instead of all 24 blend modes those
eight
are just going to be really good so you
should figure out how to write your your
games using just those eight blend modes
and like
i can't imagine unless you are actually
forced with your back up against the
wall to decide sure i'm going to only
ever
emulate my chips before running a
production run and sure i'm going to
ship them broken and then tell the
market to deal with it like
these are
i mean i guess it goes back to the
necessity as the mother of invention
there was a lot of necessity yes a lot
of necessity uh so jensen and nvidia are
just the og goat story at this
but there's another uh great example
that we had to include because we
literally just talked to this ceo a week
ago
and that's eric yuan from zoom this is
from our interview with him a week ago
and after i started the company i
realized wow it's so hard to raise
capital right
and by the way with the money that you
see they give to you don't think about
that's money
you know that's a trust you know every
dollar matters right that's why every
day
i was thinking about how to survive how
to survive how to survive even today
seriously i still think about my workout
tonight you know how to saw it so
the interesting thing about that comment
is
i asked eric the question
did you try to create a gigantic
multi-billion dollar
world-beating company with zoom or were
you just thinking about sort of um how
can i make a great product and he like
didn't even really answer my question he
was just obsessed with this notion of
survival and that when he started the
company all the way even through to
today what he's thinking about is how do
we you know ship great product and
survive
yep
it's such a it's a mindset of so many
great founders
yes
number five
strength leads to strength
so there's a chance that we picked this
one mostly just so we could show mark
andreessen on this very very large
screen
on the cover of time magazine at the
height of the dot-com mania on a throne
barefoot
uh
simpler times i feel like there needs to
be some sort of uh
similar image for 2021 yeah oh yeah i
have to think about what that is yeah a
little contest later yeah
uh so long time acquired listeners will
know this one well this really starts
with the idea of reflexivity
so if you go acquire new resources your
company
you know if you go get more capital or
that next most important customer
or a great key hire you bring in the
right executive to your team you are now
by definition more valuable than you
were before you acquired that resource
and so the question becomes well how do
you leverage
your now more valuable asset into
getting the next resource and becoming
even more powerful even more successful
and an extreme example that uh i always
think of about this comes from a
conversation that i had right here at
capital camp last year with michael
mobison which was if you looked at
tesla's
market cap in
2020 you would say that there's no way
they're worth that and that would be a
very reasonable thing to say
but what they definitely did do is use
that share price to sell new shares uh
at very little dilution and raise over
10 billion dollars of cash to the
balance sheet that year so whatever you
thought they were worth they're
definitely worth more now because they
have a fresh 10 billion dollars in cash
and they know how to use it so it really
comes down to sort of the ability to
uniquely marshal resources
and to bring it back to mark andreessen
in 2009 when a16z raised their fund 1
they came out swinging for folks who
were sort of observing the tech industry
at this point they raised 300 million
dollars for fund one in 2009 in 2009
so mark and ben knew this principle very
well
they realized what we made this huge
splash we've got this big brand people
already think we're like a top venture
firm just because we did this crazy
thing out of the gate how do we solidify
that position so
the very next year they raised a 650
billion dollar fund
million billion
sorry i forgot what decade it was
we're not in 2022 yet no but i mean as
you can tell like they've basically kept
going with this mindset of just
yesterday they raised another four and a
half billion crypto fund and they're
somewhere between 30 and 40 billion
under management now
in in what 13 years since founding
they basically never
uh took
their resources and took that as like a
static notion of like oh good now we can
you know do some interesting things with
this they basically always
looked at everything they had and say
okay we're in a strong position how do
we get stronger how do we do more faster
and and compound what we have
so
i think there's really something to just
always thinking okay i just got more
valuable
and that puts me in a position to get
even more valuable again and always just
be really thoughtful and super
aggressive about seizing that next
opportunity the other example that we
have to mention on this one from uh the
acquired canon is literally the
o.g.o.g.o.g
american capitalist business which is
standard oil did this ran this playbook
to a t it's like john rockefeller you
say oh gee like he's like actually a
gangster jesse he made actually a bit of
gangster uh
you know he was never satisfied no
matter how big standard oil got it was
never big enough no matter what
competitor he would acquire into the
fold uh
by whatever means necessary or no matter
what railroad uh he just did a
deal a deal with
um he would always use that to say okay
tomorrow morning i wake up and we figure
out how to use my new more valuable
company
all right for our next sponsor we have
mystery this is so cool i feel like
mystery has really like
come out of in some ways and grown out
of the acquired community and built
just a juggernaut mystery has built the
leading online platform for team events
and employee engagement you know all
those zoom happy hours you've been doing
with your team for the past few years
there are netflix parties or whatever
and how they really really are not fun
mystery fixes that makes them awesome
it is magical like you have to
experience it to understand so we are
gonna do
a mystery for the whole acquired
community this is gonna be great this
might be the largest mystery ever and
they've done some really really large
ones trust me
so on thursday july 7th
2022
we are going to do
an acquired mystery event
for everyone ben and i will be there and
you can sign up and join at
tri-mystery.com acquired and in true
mystery fashion what we are doing will
be a surprise but i can promise it will
be
really really really awesome at this
point i think mystery has got to be the
largest or one of the largest online
event operators in the entire world or
if not close to it they manage events
for hundreds of thousands of employees
at companies like amazon microsoft apple
tesla mckinsey uber twitter ford stripe
starbucks fidelity convoy modern
treasury the growth has been astounding
and what's even cooler it's actually
been accelerating as the market has
turned in the past few months and
companies spending smartly on employee
engagement has become even more
important before mystery you had to
deputize some poor team member to do
these events to plan them it was a
thankless job with no upside on top of
your main job nobody wanted to do it
mystery takes over 100 of that it is
their full-time job their best in the
world before mystery companies would
spend all this money on team events
employee engagement and it was just like
going into a black hole you didn't know
if it was
helping your team be more engaged and
happy or even hurting god forbid or had
no impact you had no idea with mystery
they actually use software and surveys
to measure the impact of these events
imagine that on your team imagine that
understanding the impact of your spend
on these things on your employee
engagement your workforce morale and
based on the data and the results they
get they can then actually tailor the
events and make them even better for
your team so it's just like it is a
no-brainer to do this
so thursday july 7th you sign up in
advance and then go to tri-mystery.com
acquired
you can also get their awesome three
events for the price of one for your
team special deal for the acquired
community
this is going to be super cool
sign up we'll have a blast
and this will be a great way to close
out the season
thank you mystery
all right number six this is another one
that is uh near and dear to my heart
it's never too late uh and there are
actually two
meanings uh to this lesson one
is also another great mark andreessen
piece of wisdom so there's a great uh
famous quote of his from uh interview i
think this was in 2014 that he did um
where he said i came out here in 1994
to silicon valley and the valley was in
hibernation my big feeling was i just
missed it i missed the whole thing it
had happened in the 80s and i got here
too late and silicon valley was over and
obviously that was completely not true
and um what's cool about this is that
like
silicon valley and technology moves in
waves it's related to moore's law every
time there's a 10x in computing there's
a new market there's a new paradigm
there's a new technology that gets
created and so yes mark was right he
missed the pc wave it was too late for
that but he was right on time for the
internet wave and as long as moore's law
holds
if you work in technology if you invest
in technology if you build
technology-enabled products it's never
too late you are always right on the
cusp of the next generation that's
coming the other meaning of it's never
too late uh folks who are viewing the
video and here here in the auditorium
will notice we have not mark andreessen
on this slide but dr morris chang the
founder of tsmc
and so this is i think the other lesson
that um that i've really taken from
acquired which is that uh
on the in this bane which is that morris
chang was 56 years old when he founded
tsmc and tsmc is today i believe the
11th most valuable company in the world
yep and it's so easy you know the flip
side of the coin of there's always
another generation there's always
another way we should tell you that it
may be the thing
keeping
geopoli political tensions at rest like
it may be the force that nobody wants to
destabilize and therefore we have peace
like
it's not just a company but it's easy to
think you know if you listen to
to mark or that there's always another
way that's for young people like it's
it's steve jobs it's mark zuckerberg
it's vitalik buterin it's these young
kids who get these new waves of
technology and the reality is that's
just not true it's just a mindset like
you have to be willing to dive in and do
it and you can do it at 56 years old and
still build the 11th most most valuable
company in the world when we were doing
this um you know putting this together i
was arguing with david that like this
isn't novel you know this is only novel
recently like if you think back to what
venture capital was in the the 60s and
70s it was funding
veterans of the cisco's of the world
and and you know the the fairchilds of
the world
who had designed you know five chips
before to go start a new company and
build the sixth ship of their life you
know in their 50s yeah and it's only the
advent of the internet with cloud
computing with you know super low cost
to start a company that there has been
this wave of
uh very young founders creating these
consumer internet companies but
that's actually a blip in history
it's funny that now the pendulum has
swung so far to the lore being oh these
young hot shot founders that we have to
even make this crazy point of wow a 56
year old can start an important
world-changing company job yeah the
trader s eight were you know not in
their 20s
yes
all right
this is a familiar face that many of you
will recognize
uh
point number seven is don't mistake
options for cash flow this is from our
episode with michael mobison who we
mentioned we met here last year at camp
so what do we mean by don't mistake
buying options for investigating cash
flow well there's this word investing
it's come up a lot this week
it is used for multiple purposes this is
sort of an overloaded word and
classically defined investing in the ben
graham sense is that you are looking at
a series of cash flows
that a business generates from today
into the future you apply some discount
rate you value those you know cash flows
uh at what they're worth in this present
day and you look at things like
characteristics of the business like
potential margin expansion or their
growth rate and you make all sorts of
assumptions uh based on again the cash
flows that you know to exist today and
you try and come up with some price that
that business is worth and you try and
put some money in and invest at that
price but then that doesn't sound at all
like what we do
no david and i are professional seed
stage venture capitalists and people
call what i do investing but while it's
the same word it doesn't involve
literally any of the things that i just
mentioned you know in that that previous
comment
it is
funny to me that that it is is called
investing like it is it's
typically just a founder and an idea on
a napkin so how can you make any
assumptions about the cash flows
and then we're like well
that founder and that idea is worth 20
million oh it's so funny to me that
people think it's complete voodoo math
how uh how venture capital has come up
with with valuations this is where i
think that the sort of michael's comment
and his his his thoughts on this uh make
a lot of sense because once you admit
that there is no dcf and you stop trying
to say in what world is that worth 20
million dollars or 10 million dollars or
70 million dollars at an idea stage
which we've seen recently
well
then if you're willing to let that go
and you meditate and take your deep
breath and say okay well how do we price
this thing then if it's not based on you
know classic investing dcfs
really
venture capital in the early stage
is not at all cash flow based investing
it's actually options investing and
as you sort of think about it that way
the world starts to make more sense
because how do you value an option well
you look at the range of potential
outcomes and the probabilistic
likelihood of that option and the entire
range of outcomes which is actually what
venture capitalists are doing whether
they're cognitively thinking about it
that way or not you're basically saying
what's the chance that this is a billion
dollar company or a hundred billion
dollar company or a zero and of course
this leads to the idea that you need
diverse portfolios rather than just
investing in single large companies
because this range of potential outcomes
is so wide that you need to find ways to
sort of smooth that risk while still
benefiting from the potential of an
asymmetric return it also completely
explains why venture capitalists are so
obsessed with tam it was one of the
things when i first got into the
industry i was like why does everybody
care so much about the tam like aren't
there other aspects that you should care
about well that's what's most sensitive
to the valuation of the option it is the
the magnitude of the outcomes that uh
that are possible like you can you can
then debate the probable weighting of it
but
the higher the magnitude of the outcomes
the more valuable the option is going to
be right if i think there's some x
percent chance that this thing becomes
the next apple what should i pay for it
now that is actually the question you
are asking rather than
dcf in your way to something there but
of course it's it's sterile uh and kind
of terrible to talk about people's
life's work as buying an option so
there's an important corollary to this
yes and this is from
our friends over at altos ventures and
in particular honom
and he makes this great point he
actually just remade it on twitter the
other day which is
yeah okay like you probably should think
about valuations and venture capital
investing more like options than you do
thinking about investing in public
companies on a cash flow basis but don't
mistake startups for lottery tickets
these may be options to you from an
investing standpoint but these founders
are real people with families and lives
and bank accounts and employees
and the other
the other thing that is
fundamentally different about venture
capital investing versus say public
market investing is it's a multi-turn
game not a single turn game and so how
you behave and how you treat these
founders even if it's clear that your
option is going to expire worthless you
don't know what those founders are going
to go do next you don't know who their
friends are you don't know who they're
going to talk to you don't know what the
other investors around the table might
think about the way you behaved or
didn't behave during that period of time
so it's this
interesting i think these two dynamics
really explain the culture in silicon
valley a lot which is
you're doing options based investing but
it's a multi-turn game
yeah and in practice nobody's actually
just doing one or the other everyone's
style of investing is somewhere on the
spectrum here because
other than the pure play value investors
who are you know looking at the the book
value of a company or the seed stage
investors or the precede like me
who are looking at a napkin sketch and a
founder with an idea or sometimes even
no idea most people are actually in the
middle so most people have to blend some
notion of what are the chances this
could be big and how big with the idea
that hey they're actually generating
revenue and sometimes even you know cash
flow as a startup and i actually can
apply some uh multiple to that and
obviously the multiple can can change
rapidly on you and then you have to
adapt but um everybody's doing a little
bit of one and a little bit of the other
all right
for our next lesson focus on what makes
your beer taste better so we brought up
uh this little vignette on a whole bunch
of episodes unacquired but this is an
image of jeff bezos at the 2008 y
combinator startup school which was a
which is a um which is a moment in
history a very important moment in
history so why see at least used to i
don't know if they they still do it's
probably virtual now yeah we put on
these physical events in silicon valley
i went to one in the bill graham civic
auditorium that's right i went to one
too um
and they would bring founders and you
know luminaries to come and talk and
inspire the next generation of founders
and basically to inspire applications to
yc
and so in 2008 bezos came and this was
right after aws had launched and he used
it as a marketing opportunity to market
to all of these startups and future
startups about why
they should build on aws instead of
rolling their own infrastructure which
we should say this strategy worked
ludicrously well like aws got probably a
five-year lead on cloud by piling people
on the plane from seattle going down to
the bay area evangelizing like crazy to
all these stars all these tiny startups
who in that very room at the 2008 yc
startup school a startup that had not
even been built yet
was airbnb the three airbnb founders
were at that yc startup school and
that's why they decided to apply to yc
that year and the rest is history worked
for bezos and it worked for yc too
indeed but
if you go watch the talk which i highly
recommend it's really great um
jeff uses this sort of uh odd analogy
for aws where he talks about european
beer distillery beer breweries around
the turn of the 20th century and you're
like all right jeff where are you going
with this and uh the point the analogy
he makes is electricity had just been
invented and this was this massive boon
enabling technology for
consumer you know products cpg like like
beer
they could now brew vastly more
quantities of beer than you could before
using electricity but the first
breweries to adopt it they built their
own power generators they made their own
power
and
that worked fine for a few years but it
was super capital intensive required all
this operational labor to run the power
generators and then the utilities
companies came along and the next
generation of breweries
they didn't make their own power they
just rented it from the utility
companies and they you know ran
roughshod over the first generation of
breweries to use power because
guess what whoever makes your
electricity has no impact on how your
beer tastes literally making it yourself
does not make your beer taste better but
it does raise your cost structure it
does raise your cost structure and so
jeff's argument to all of these startups
was you know focus on what makes your
beer taste better so there's two lessons
here
one is what he's arguing that
as a startup you should focus solely not
just startup any company you should
focus solely on the attributes of your
product that your customers are going to
care about
everything else your infrastructure
doesn't matter outsource
the second perhaps more important
takeaway from this
if you look at what bezos did not what
he said is that being a utility company
is an exceedingly exceedingly great
business
and particularly being an unregulated
utility company yes and uh i mean that's
the reason that amazon became a
profitable business it absolutely is and
and not just amazon if you think about
you know
it's a profitable company you know where
they piled up too much cash to reinvest
all their cash flows but if you think
about this model of like what is an
unregulated utility company in
technology
it can be so defensible and powerful
like that's what square is that's what
shopify is that's what i think
two-thirds of our sponsors on acquired
are you know that's what vanta is modern
treasury vouch uh even mystery all of
you know if you can provide a critical
mission critical piece of infrastructure
that other companies can use
that they need but doesn't make their
actual beer taste better
it's a great place to source it i was
thinking about this um
just to go off script again because it's
fun up here
i think the
this is actually the same thing as like
the economic theory of specialization of
labor but applied to businesses where
it's basically well understood at this
point that
gdp tends to go up when people get
really good at a thing focus their time
on doing that thing and then turn to
their neighbor who's good at a different
thing to provide that service back to
them rather than everybody doing
everything for themselves and their
lives
and
this is just that on a business scale
totally
all right
the next one is one that is uh near and
dear to my heart and i had a lot of fun
illustrating this so bear with me on
some of these visuals so this one is
scale up or niche down and i want to
start first by talking about niching
down
so
this photo is
ripped with love from brooks running's
website
it's a great berkshire company we had
jim weber the ceo on stage with us for
our arena show a couple weeks back in
seattle
so for folks who don't know uh brooks is
a pretty special company
back in 2002
when jim came in
uh they weren't frankly um they were
everything to everyone they didn't just
make running shoes they made everything
shoes including twenty 20 shoes that you
would wear at a family barbecue
and
they made all sorts of apparel for all
sorts of sports
the company was losing money i think 5
million a year in the red they were
doing about 60 million in revenue but
obviously not able to capture a lot of
value out of that and so when jim came
in to turn the company around the first
thing he did was decide we are going to
be a running company and we are going to
be a running company for performance
runners for people who care
about their running and so immediately
went to a bunch of their distributors
big box stores slashed entire product
lines so they went from 60 million in
revenue down to 30 or something like
that they got rid of all their
unprofitable uh product lines they got
rid of anything that wasn't performance
running
they blew up their whole distribution
channel and they started
caring only about these performance
running shoes focusing on r d and really
investing in building brand with runners
well i'll save you the whole story and
just flash forward 20 years it worked
they grew slowly at first but then over
time
it really started to pay off and they
really started to be known as one of the
best running shoe companies in the world
in fact they're one of the top couple at
any big marathon that you'll see when
they take the high speed cameras brooks
brooks brooks brooks and of course some
asics and some um some newer brands too
and of course the the new crazy nike
shoes but they just realize we are
not going to beat nike like we are not
going to beat nike at the everything
game so we have to niche down and play a
different game so i mentioned that 60
million to 30-ish million in revenue
last year they did close to 1.2 billion
and had a great year last year through
the pandemic and are continuing to ride
this wave of running becoming one of the
the largest and fastest growing um
athletic apparel opportunities in the
world it's such an amazing compounding
story and berkshire story they've been
growing at 30 to 40 a year for like the
last 20 years it's amazing duration the
reason
so
it also works to scale up so a quick
case study we did an episode on the new
york times a couple years ago and while
every mid-sized newspaper in the u.s was
going bankrupt thanks to disruption
brought by the internet the new york
times became gigantic and a healthier
business than ever
and
the time saw the idea to be sort of the
one national brand and one of a few
trusted global brands in the space the
internet as we know can be brutal to
people caught in the middle because it
enabled everyone in the world to access
any reporting
basically for free pretty easily and so
then whoever has the best reporting in
the world on global or national stories
of course sort of gets all of the
traffic and everyone in the middle is
stuck so this obviously has an enormous
cost associated with it you know you
need to
basically hire all the best reporters
you need to have the most reporters you
need to build out
i mean massive technology investments
the new york times is truly a technology
company at this point so super high
fixed costs so you got to believe that
you're actually going to be able to
operate at that global scale to
justify all of these fixed costs
so
the point here is sure you can niche
down sure you can scale up but you
really don't want to get caught in the
middle now on the media side
it's kind of funny you've got these tiny
little businesses like acquired strategy
our good friends at colossus
the internet while being extremely
punishing to the middle
also enables these deep niches to form
it's sort of this interesting barbell
effect where if you keep your cross
structure low and you're super super
focused on a niche you can aggregate all
the people who are weird on the internet
about your niche in the entire world and
basically aggregate them together and
create community of people who like
three hour business technology podcasts
and i think like
it's important to realize that this may
not happen overnight for acquired it's
taken seven years for us to get to
quarter million subscribers but if
you're just like repeatedly
loud and specific about the value
proposition that you can bring to people
by following your media publication
people find their way you know time and
enough distribution and enough content
kind of does its thing so i i always
sort of focus back on
i'm glad that we didn't decide to be
you know a mid-scale media company that
it's really like all right
it's it's you and i and some microphones
and the new york times can have that
market
so a couple other points here i don't
think this is unique to media i think
media was the first to experience this
sort of squishing in the middle but it's
gonna happen to everything
the internet
is still rippling out in all of its
effects i mean you can see it in venture
capital for sure you've got big funds
like sequoia and andreessen that get
massive and then niche funds especially
for the early stage emerge and there's
great opportunities for small funds who
are very focused those caught in the
middle are in a tough spot and they're
super undifferentiated and you can
imagine this happening with universities
harvard and stanford brands are going to
be just fine like those will continue to
probably grow in value as they're able
to address more and more people using
the internet obviously that happens
slowly cause no one wants to devalue
their brand but as that becomes more and
more widely accepted i think those
brands will just continue to get more
powerful
you could imagine this happening in a
bunch of other industries too besides
just
media capital education
so as a final little illustration at
this point uh i just want to pull up a
couple of uh of market cap slides so in
1997 there were three companies in the
uh uh top 10 in the world that were
technology companies today it's eight of
the top ten what happened between then
and now well the internet penetrated the
whole world and
obviously the returns to scale got
massively concentrated here where you
can see that uh
the the most value companies in the
world not only are they technology
internet companies they're much more
valuable than they were before so
there's this sort of counterintuitive
thing that the internet was a
decentralized network it started as
servers at universities and then somehow
it massively concentrated the returns to
scale for the platforms that underlie
everything that we do all day every day
and on the flip side it also enabled the
viability of the long tail it's not you
know that we have 30 mid-size retailers
in the us anymore the way that we used
to not at all there's amazon and then
there's how many merchants are there on
shopify now we've got something like 2
million shopify merchants and over 30
million amazon sellers
the platformification that the the
internet sort of brought really enabled
viability of the long tail at the same
time
all right and for our final sponsor of
the episode we have as always our good
friends over at
modern treasury modern treasury is by
far the best way to manage your
company's payment operations their
platform allows you to move money
within
your product using code and not manual
finance operations this is huge with
their apis you can move money
within your product which is pretty
important for just about
anything you would want to do these days
and gosh having worked with so many
companies so many marketplaces
especially over the years
this was a nightmare on
the back end for
marketplace teams of having to manage
ledgers bank accounts moving money
keeping custody it was
very very very difficult modern treasury
abstracts all of that all of that away
and enables you just by integrating
their api and managing everything
through their best-in-class web apps you
can take all of that complexity of
banking rails
off of your team's hands
and let them do it probably far better
than you ever could honestly
it's just an incredible company it's so
cool they're such a part of the acquired
community we did our reverse interview
lp show with them a few years ago back
when they were a tiny tiny little
company doing 10 million dollars per
month in money that they were moving on
the platform well fast forward to
last fall when we first started talking
about working with them as a sponsor
they were moving 100 million dollars a
month on the platform and now they are
moving billions of dollars every month
on the platform it is one of these like
maturity of the internet things where
first you can move bits then you can
move text and you can move images and
you can do videos then you could
programmatically do things like place
calls with people like twilio using apis
and now you can use modern treasuries
apis and user interfaces for
non-technical folks to literally move
money around and they're so deeply
integrated with all these banks that
like
it just works it's pretty cool it's
super cool so customers like gusto
marketa revolut pipe trip actions class
pass block five ledger x gusto
all the way through to web3 companies
and crypto all use modern treasury and
their banking rails to move money around
within the apps
so if you're building a fintech app we
used to say you definitely need money
treasury
the odds are it's impossible that you
don't already know about modern treasury
if you're building a fintech app but
even if you're not building a fintech
app
the ability to integrate money and money
movement into pretty much anything these
days is mission critical so go check
them out you can learn more at
moderntreasury.com
acquired and when you get in touch just
tell them that ben and david sent you
thanks modern treasury
all right coming down the home stretch
staying on the media theme so we did
this episode on oprah uh two years ago
now and uh in harpo studios and it was
so great and um
what uh our big takeaway from that was a
line that was said to oprah right as she
was starting her own show and made a
momentous business decision which was
don't be talent own the business
and uh the sort of way that i like to
think about this is if you want to be a
millionaire in the media business
you should work really really hard you
should own your craft you should become
must-see content
totally unique the opposite of a
commodity you should be steph curry
leonardo dicaprio you know what have you
if you want to be a billionaire in the
media business you should do all of
those things and you should never ever
ever ever give away the rights to your
content
or sell the rights to your content uh
and that's that's what oprah did we also
told the taylor swift story earlier this
year you know taylor started as just
another country music artist and then
just another pop artist
and and then in the past few years she's
completely changed the whole structure
of the industry by
figuring out ways to get back the rights
to her original music which is an
incredible story
and this is fairly unique
for media right like for content it's
this is easier to do than if you were
say a basketball player yes yeah it's
it's hard for athletes to do this at
least in their sports like athletes can
own their personal brand and they can
leverage that into building something on
the side but the thing that they do
they're playing within someone else's
game the interesting thing about content
is you can always just make it your own
game because the internet enables this
one
that's the last you know cool thing
about this which is that thanks to sub
stack podcasting youtube tick tock
instagram it's never been easier you
don't need nbc you don't need universal
music group in fact they might hold you
back
anybody can publish anything on the
internet
all right this one is reasonably
self-explanatory but it's another bezos
ism and so i want to bring up in the
very first shareholder letter in 1997
he wrote
because of our emphasis on the long term
and people probably might know how to
recite this by heart at this point
we may make decisions and weigh
trade-offs differently than some
companies we will focus on growth with
an emphasis on long-term profitability
and capital management at this stage we
choose to prioritize growth because we
believe that scale is central to
achieving the potential of our business
model
this is absolutely bezos's way of
basically saying if you're not on my bus
get off because this is what we're doing
they stayed true to their word for 20
years without turning a profit as we
talked about earlier you could argue
they still wouldn't be profitable today
if it weren't for aws
they've reinvested every dollar of the
retail business for two decades there is
zero chance that they would have been
able to execute the strategy that they
did if it weren't for their ability to
be loud and proud about their intentions
and as we sort of drift toward the the
close here uh i'll be a little bit
less bashful about acquired specific
examples i've wanted to highlight other
businesses but this one's sort of too
close to home
we're obsessed with this idea of
treating our audience like they're smart
and this wasn't the fastest path to
growth because i think we could have
listened to what everyone told us
podcast episodes need to be a half hour
podcast episodes you know need to drop
every single week so you keep this
content cadence but we wanted to be
weird on the internet about something
and we wanted to basically be unabashed
about it and so i'd say that the people
that we get to interact with now and in
the community and all the folks that we
met here who mentioned oh i've listened
to the show
we ended up with exactly the listeners
that we wanted and the people that we
want to spend time with because
is a long game to play if you're saying
if you don't want to be on the bus with
us that is fine please get off as soon
as possible
indeed which is the perfect lead-in to
our final
lesson from seven years i've acquired uh
speaking of getting on the bus we all
need to do that to go to
the party uh
and what are we gonna do at the party
we're gonna have fun and that is what
this is all about if you can find
something that you can do with your
business with your life where you have
genuinely have fun doing it and for
other people who do the same thing it's
work you are going to run farther and
longer and faster and better than
everybody else and there's actually
another takeaway to this so we put the
uh an image of us and our our friends
packy mccormick and mario gabrielli at
her at our arena show the other week up
here uh it was just such a blast this
whole thing this whole journey it's been
so fun um but one you're gonna work
harder than people for whom this is work
uh and bill gurley makes this great
point in his running down the dream talk
which we've talked about on acquired
everybody should go watch that on
youtube but the other point is that
it's so much easier to evangelize and
grow and market and have people
attracted to whatever it is you're doing
if you genuinely have joy in doing it
and
joy is not something you can really fake
so
that's our biggest lesson we we have had
such a blast during these past seven
years we've gotten to meet amazing folks
like patrick and brent whole capital
camp team and
we're just so thankful
all right listeners hope you enjoyed our
talk from capital camp please let us
know your feedback acquired.fm
slack would love to hang out with you in
there and here are some of your favorite
themes from all the playbooks over
200-ish episodes i actually didn't count
exactly but it's a lot i didn't either i
think it's well over 200 when you
include all the lp episodes yeah it's
250 with those ah wow so we definitely
skipped a lot i had 18 and david maybe
trim it down to 12. so i'm curious if
some of the ones that we didn't talk
about are ones that uh that you want to
bring up i originally wanted 10 and ben
was
fought too hard that i gave him two
extras yes well thank you so much for
being with us uh this season and on
these special episodes it's been an
awesome six months we're super pumped
for the next six months we have some
great stuff planned with that our thank
you to the solana foundation
to mystery and to modern treasury and
we'll see you next time
see you next time who got the truth
is it you is it you is it you who got
the truth now huh
[Music]
you
Loading video analysis...