Women Are Slowly Learning The Truth
By Alexander Grace
Summary
## Key takeaways - **Men don't win arguments; they just stop engaging.**: When a woman becomes too emotional and erratic during a disagreement, a man often withdraws not because he concedes, but because he no longer sees her as a worthy competitor and arguing feels cruel. [01:06], [01:38] - **Male vs. Female Conflict: Sport vs. Reality TV**: Male conflict is direct, rule-based, and aims to establish competence, like a sport. Female conflict is indirect, perception-based, and never truly ends, resembling reality TV. [04:44], [04:50] - **Women rarely apologize; they shift the focus.**: Women seldom apologize because it implies a conclusion, which is rare in their conflict style. Instead, they may escalate emotionally, making the argument about the man's perceived lack of care rather than the original issue. [06:41], [09:13] - **Men are held to a higher behavioral standard.**: Men are forced into self-censorship and emotional restraint to avoid being labeled abusive, while women's emotional reactions are often excused. This creates a significant double standard where men carry more emotional responsibility. [12:42], [13:03] - **Arguments are rarely about the stated issue.**: When arguing with a woman, the conflict is often not about the surface-level topic but about her underlying fears of losing connection. Men are advised to act as translators rather than debaters. [15:07], [15:41]
Topics Covered
- Men don't lose arguments, they withdraw.
- Men and women play different conflict games.
- Why women rarely apologize in relationship conflicts.
- Emotional escalation: A strategic female conflict tool?
- Society's double standard for emotional expression.
Full Transcript
Your wife is not going to apologize.
That's not how women work. Yes, you were
right, but because you were right, you
are the villain. Every fight, every
divorce is caused by the same thing. And
by the end of this video, you'll
understand why men are always more
powerful than women, and why that means
you are destined to lose every argument.
>> This is terrible new information. And I
thought I was winning every argument
with my husband because I was right and
he was wrong. But I just put the camera
at his height, so how he sees me. And I
realized this is not the case at all.
I'm not winning because I'm right. I'm
winning because how could you take me
seriously? I look like I should have
cartoon steam coming out of my ears.
Hello, I'm so mad right now. I would be
choking back laughter if I was arguing
with me. I'm not winning on merit. I'm
winning because I look helpless and
silly. This is how he sees the whole
world. No wonder the guy's so confident.
Of course, he gives up in 10 seconds and
kisses my forehead. I look like a small
woodland creature trying to tell a
giant. You Hey, giant, I've got
something to tell you.
>> It is very rare that a man ever actually
loses an argument with a woman. Most
often, he just retreats and stops
arguing. The woman might think that
she's won, but in reality, he's just
given up. He may have started out
engaging with her, countering her
points, making rational arguments,
trying to present his case logically.
But what often happens is that a woman's
behavior deteriorates. She becomes so
erratic, so emotional that it causes him
to withdraw because when she's in that
state, continuing to argue feels wrong.
He's not conceding, he is humoring the
woman. Essentially, she becomes too
small to compete with. Her tone, her
emotional volatility, her need to be
right. It begins to seem childish, which
makes him feel like he's fighting with a
toddler, which just doesn't seem fair.
He withdraws, but it's not because he's
threatened or feels beaten. No, he was
disturbed by the mismatch. He no longer
sees her as a worthy rival. Most men
have an innate aversion to anything that
doesn't seem like it is a fair fight.
And so at some point when her behavior
is just going off the walls, continuing
to argue with her feels cruel and so he
withdraws as an act of mercy. For most
relationships between men and women, the
power imbalance is just too big to
ignore. He's taller, he's stronger, he's
more emotionally controlled. Often he's
the financial provider. He provides the
boundaries and discipline in the house.
And usually he is less dependent on
affection and closeness. The truth is
that in these dynamics, the man usually
holds all of the cards, and that's the
real reason why he puts his weapons
down. But this begs the question, if the
power imbalance between men and women is
so vast, how are you meant to resolve
conflict with your wife or girlfriend?
What's a man to do? Because if he fights
back with full force, he's a bully. But
if he just capitulates, he loses her
respect. Men don't know what to do. How
are you meant to be in conflict with a
woman? What are the rules? In one form
or another, this confusion is the reason
why you got divorced, why you and your
ex-girlfriend broke up, or why you and
billions of other men across the planet
had an argument with your partner last
week. Fundamentally, you just don't
understand how you are meant to compete
with a woman. You know how to compete
with other men, and women know how to
compete with other women. But when men
and women clash, it's like they're not
even playing the same game. It's like
putting a basketball player and a
golfing pro next to each other, blowing
the whistle, and saying, "Okay, start."
How are they meant to do that? What game
are they meant to play? What are the
rules? This is my point. It's almost
impossible for men to actually argue
with women because you're playing
different games. Do you understand how
women compete? Do you know the rules? Do
you understand the game? Who wins, who
loses, how you score points? Because if
you think it is the same way that men
compete, you are sorely mistaken. Male
competition is very straightforward.
There's very little ambiguity. You
either win or you don't. The battlefield
is external and every man is required to
play by the rules. We don't tolerate
cheating or dirty play. And there is
usually an inherent respect given to
your competitor. Of course, you try and
win, but if you lose, you shake hands,
you give him his dues, and then you
train harder so that you can beat him
next time. And the purpose of all of
this is not just ego inflation. It's
about creating a hierarchy of
competence, establishing authority and
leadership. We're trying to sort out
where everybody stands. And best of all,
there is a clear end to the conflict. At
some point, a winner is declared and
then life moves on. If you want to know
what male conflict looks like, it's
sport. But if you want to understand
what female conflict looks like, it's
reality TV. There's no respect for your
competitor, and there's certainly no
end. The competition doesn't just stop
at some point when the whistle is blown.
You watch The Housewives or one of those
reality real estate shows. You'll see
that they are able to drag female
conflict out for seasons. Female
competition is indirect. They very
rarely openly challenge each other. It's
not about force. It's about perception,
status, emotional control, social
alliances. And the weapons are
completely different. Gossip,
vulnerability, even compliments can all
be turned into weapons. And for women,
plausible deniability is essential. The
most effective strike you can land upon
an enemy is one where you pretend that
you're their friend. And women feel
triumphant not through any external
measure of goals scored, but from being
the one who is socially included. The
winner is subject to democracy. It's a
popularity contest. And because there's
no reference to objective standards,
establishing a hierarchy is not the
purpose. It's about conquering emotional
and social territory. That means that
the conflict never ends. Things are
always shifting, which leads women to be
constantly on edge, unsure of themselves
and of their position. It creates a high
level of anxiety and a debilitating fear
of being judged. Do you see how
different this is? Why conflict
resolution is almost impossible? The two
of you are playing by completely
different rules. So, what does this mean
for you and your relationship? How are
you meant to resolve conflict with a
woman? That's what I'm going to talk
about in this video. But first, I want
to quickly thank everybody for the
birthday wishes. October is my birthday
month. I'm turning 38. And to celebrate,
there is a 38% discount on my Patreon.
If you sign up, you get early access and
the extended versions of all of my
videos.
>> So much in women that drives me nuts is
women who can't apologize. Oh,
accountability,
>> but they cannot own up at all. Like,
they refuse. I So much so that a guy
that I dated before I met my husband, I
remember we had some type of argument
and I said, "I'm really sorry. I
shouldn't have said something that way."
And he almost passed out because he was
like, no woman in his life had ever
said, "I'm sorry."
>> Of course.
>> And he was like, "What the hell?" Of
course.
>> But I see women, even my friends, will
have a fight with their boyfriend or
their husband, and I'll have to tell
them, "Listen, you need to apologize
because sometimes it's going to be you."
>> Most men can recall that one argument
where it was absolutely clear, black and
white, that they were correct and their
wife was wrong, and they would have
loved to receive an apology. And they've
been waiting. You've probably got an
example in your own life that you're
thinking about right now, thinking,
"Man, an apology would be nice." Well,
let me ask you, how long have you been
waiting for that apology? A couple of
weeks, 20 years? It very rarely happens.
Women do not readily offer up apologies
because an apology means that there is
some kind of conclusion, a shared
understanding of what has occurred. But
that's not likely to happen. Men and
women are very rarely on the same page
because, as we've established, they're
playing by different rules. It is rare
for a couple to even agree about what
they are arguing about, let alone in
determining which one of them is at
fault. You see, men come into arguments
expecting clear rules, logic, and
rationality, and they are looking for a
path to a resolution. But women bring an
entirely different toolkit. They come in
analyzing tone and subtext and emotional
momentum. For them, it's not so much a
debate as a relational power struggle.
So, you've got the man, he's bringing in
facts and examples and consistency,
believing that the better argument is
going to prevail. But this backfires on
him because for her, it's not about the
facts, it's about the emotions. And the
more rational the arguments that he's
presenting emotionally, the more cold he
appears. She freaks out because he's not
playing by the rules. And so she
emotionally escalates, ripping the
situation out of the realm of facts and
pitching the battle on ground that she
feels more comfortable with. It's truly
a genius strategy because when she does
this, she no longer has to prove him
wrong. She just has to make him seem
like he is uncaring and cruel. When she
uses emotional tactics like crying and
escalating, she has effectively changed
what the two of you are arguing about
because it's no longer a disagreement
over facts. Suddenly, you're arguing
about whether or not you are an
emotional jerk who doesn't care about
what she's feeling. And most men are
extremely slow to catch on to what's
going on here. He thought they were
making progress, that he was presenting
his case really well. But suddenly she
is sobbing and he finds himself
apologizing and withdrawing, not because
he thinks that he's wrong, but because
he's overwhelmed and confused and he
just wants all the chaos to stop. You
can see how effective this female
strategy has been in that it puts men in
this double bind. If he pushes back
against her, then he's a bully. But if
he gives in, he's weak and emasculated.
And so he's trapped in this game where
winning makes him feel like a villain,
but losing makes her lose respect for
him. The entire terrain of the argument
begins to feel like one giant
psychological booby trap. Men don't know
which direction to go. Nowhere feels
safe and eventually a lot of men just
give up. They don't believe that there
is a right way to engage with a woman
like this. If every single move that you
make can be reframed as you being wrong,
then what's the point in trying? She has
created a learned helplessness inside
the man. He stops fighting not because
he thinks that he's wrong, but because
he's come to believe that the game is
unwininnable. But in the aftermath, so
much damage has been done because the
two of you are in completely different
realities. She might think that she's
won the argument. She feels vindicated,
but you know that you didn't lose the
game. You just opted out. And now you've
lost respect for her. You see her
differently. Before she was an equal.
She was a worthy competitor. You didn't
mind having a spirited debate because
you were confident the rationality was
going to win out. But when you see that
all she has is emotion, well then
suddenly you view her less as a partner
and more as a child to be managed. And
let me be clear, I'm not saying that all
women do this or this is an illustration
of how all relationships function. But
even if you're dating a highquality
woman, if she does lose track of
herself, this is the pattern that's
likely to unfold. If she does slip into
toxicity, this is what it's going to
look like. But any woman who thinks that
she is powerful because she got her
boyfriend or husband to give in during
an argument, she needs to check her
assumptions because she has a
fundamental misunderstanding of what
power is. Just because you're screaming
and having a tantrum and ultimately
getting your way, that does not make you
powerful. It's actually the person who
was calm and restrained and showed
tolerance who maintains the upper hand.
He saw your emotional escalation and he
chose to not engage. It's like him
giving you his umbrella during a
rainstorm. Yes, you might be the one
who's dry, but it's ultimately still his
umbrella. In relational conflicts, men
suppress their anger. They monitor their
tone and they restrain their emotional
expression, not because they are weak,
but because they know what the
consequences would be if they unleashed
their full strength. He knows if he was
to say what he's really thinking, the
relationship would not survive. There is
a very deep asymmetry here. Men are
forced into self-censorship not just to
preserve peace, but also to protect
himself because he knows if he was to
express his emotions the same way that
she does without any restraint or
self-control, he would very quickly be
labeled abusive, toxic, dangerous. The
double standard here is enormous. A
woman can be emotional, reactive, even
cruel, but all of her behavior is going
to be dismissed and justified. Oh,
that's just her feelings. She's just
having an emotional moment. If men
started acting the way that women did,
even just 10% of it, they would be
labeled unstable. The unagnowledged
truth is that in our society, men are
held to a much higher behavioral
standard. This is a privilege that women
will not admit that they have, but it is
absolutely true. They have the freedom
to act really badly and then just blame
it on their emotions. In practical
terms, what this means is that in
individual relationships, it is
typically the man who carries the
emotional responsibility of that
dynamic. Just like I explained in my
rational pig video, I'll put a link to
that one below if you haven't seen that
yet. It always falls upon the strong to
care for the weak. And so, what is the
solution? Truthfully, women need to do
better. The sad fact of the matter is
that this toxic behavior gets excused
because it is gendered. There is no way
to justify throwing tantrums, abandoning
rationality, and emotionally escalating
in the middle of a disagreement. It is
childish behavior and it needs to be
condemned. But because it so strongly
presents in women, this behavior gets
the de facto protection of feminism as
though this kind of behavior is
inherently justifiable because it's most
commonly coming from women. I don't buy
it and I hope that you don't either. We
need to raise our standards. We need to
expect better. If you are in a
disagreement with a woman and you are
sticking to the facts, trying to find a
resolution, and the woman that you're
arguing with just says whatever comes to
her mind, she's changing the topics.
She's emotionally escalating. That's not
okay. It's childish. And I understand my
words are strong and I have a male bias,
but I don't care. There is a right and a
wrong way to resolve conflict and women
on the whole need to do better. Having
said that, my advice to men to make your
life easier is to assume that every
argument that you are having with your
girlfriend or wife is not about what you
think it is. It's not about the chores.
It's not about that look that she thinks
you gave her. It's about her, her fears.
She is scared of losing connection to
you. Do not assume just because she's
complaining about one thing that that's
actually what she's upset about. I'm not
letting women off the hook. They need to
do a better job of identifying what it
is that they're feeling. They need to
grow in their self-awareness. But you
can help in this process. And I'm going
to spend the rest of this video giving
you some practical tips so that you
approach conflict with a woman less like
a debater and more like a translator. If
you'd like to see that video, please
come and join me on Patreon. That's
where I post the fulllength versions of
my videos, including a lot of the
practical tips, a lot of the nuance on
how to actually use this information to
improve your relationships. There is a
38% discount in honor of my birthday
month. It's incredible value. We've got
hundreds of videos.
Loading video analysis...